JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
What about that dent?
Jack Nessan:
--- Quote from: John Corbett on June 05, 2026, 03:18:50 PM ---I did not endorse or refute the AI answer to this question. I merely put it out there for discussion. The important question here is whether the sources AI turned to correctly documented the findings of the HSCA firearms panel on this subject. The source it used for that answer came from this forum so based on that information, the source might or might not have correctly stated the finding. Now if you want to explore this question further, I could delve deeper and find or more credible source but my belief is if the person who posted that had incorrectly stated the findings of the HSCA firearms panel, somebody would have refuted that and AI would have found the refutation as well and made note of that in its answer.
--- End quote ---
No. The dent in CE 543 is not remotely similar to the dent that the HSCA is referencing. It doesn't take an expert to look at them and see the dramatically visible difference. The HSCA dent is a rounded lip. CE 543 has a dent that looks like it was center punched in the middle. Nobody has duplicated it.
Ted Sager:
Dented neck was to hold wadding for a blank round.
Ted Sager:
To make a blank round.
John Corbett:
--- Quote from: Ted Sager on June 06, 2026, 05:56:14 AM ---Dented neck was to hold wadding for a blank round.
--- End quote ---
How do you know this?
Ted Sager:
A dent could not have come from ejecting a shell or just landing on the ground. shell brass is tough: it had to be made by someone to hold wadding for a blank round.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page
Go to full version