JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate

Hypothetical question

<< < (4/4)

Andrew Mason:

--- Quote from: John Corbett on Yesterday at 12:02:11 PM ---Without the Z-film, how would Frazier know JBC was turned too far to the right. There would have been no Z210 and no Z240.

The Z-film was the timepiece for the JFKA. Without it, the WC would have nothing to base the timing of the assassination on the sequence of the shots.

--- End quote ---
That was my point:  “So it does appear that the zfilm was important in creating the SBT.”


--- Quote ---They probably would have figured out the headshot was the final shot but would have nothing but conflicting eyewitness accounts on which to base much else. More unknowns would have given the CTs more opportunities to fill in the blanks.

--- End quote ---
They would not have had conflicting witness accounts on the first shot causing JFK to immediately react. That’s why I suggested that if the SBT had been considered (because JFK did not stop the neck bullet) it likely would have been a first shot SBT. 

Jarrett Smith:

--- Quote from: Charles Collins on Yesterday at 12:18:24 AM ---
I could be wrong, but I don’t think there is any other photographic evidence that seems to clearly show a “back and to the left” JFK head movement. So, perhaps we might have avoided that controversy.

--- End quote ---

The Nix and Muchmore films show back motion from the head shot, so more people may believe in a frontal shot.

//www.youtube.com/watch?v=fAqrs6ONvMU
//www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q6p6dEkYNlo
I think the SBT survives, but many of the witnesses heard 3 shots with the first being at Z-223 when both men react. Connally heard a rifle shot before they were both hit that many others missed. I suppose without Zapruder's film they would rely on Croft, Willis, and Altgens.

John Corbett:

--- Quote from: Andrew Mason on Today at 12:59:52 AM ---That was my point:  “So it does appear that the zfilm was important in creating the SBT.”
They would not have had conflicting witness accounts on the first shot causing JFK to immediately react. That’s why I suggested that if the SBT had been considered (because JFK did not stop the neck bullet) it likely would have been a first shot SBT.

--- End quote ---

Only because JBC insisted he was hit by the second shot. By process of elimination, they would have concluded JFK was hit by the first and third shots. However, they still would have had to wonder why only two bullets were recovered. They would have had to at least offer possible answers for that. The SS recreations would have revealed that JBC was directly in line with a bullet exiting JBC's throat and that might have been enough for them to develop the SBT which would explain why only two bullets were recovered.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page