JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
The Tippit Shooting At 1:15-1:16, FACT
Martin Weidmann:
--- Quote from: John Corbett on April 23, 2026, 02:15:52 AM ---Are you still pretending fiber matching isn't real evidence? Are you still pretending our courts haven't accepted that as valid evidence for decades?
--- End quote ---
You have got to laugh about the LN BS
On the one hand we have just had three LNs basically saying "once Oswald was dead nobody cared about the authenticity of the evidence".
Which of course means that they just threw bits and pieces together to wrap the case around an already dead man who couldn't defend himself.
And then on the other hand this clown keeps going on about what courts have accepted as "valid evidence".
Martin Weidmann:
--- Quote from: Bill Brown on April 22, 2026, 11:46:59 PM ---Once Oswald was murdered and there'd be no trial, there was no concern for a proper chain of custody of the jacket.
--- End quote ---
Don't you understand how idiotic that sounds?
But to follow your thinking; who cares if the jacket found under a car belongs to Oswald. Let's just say it does and make it easier to call him guilty. Is that what you are saying?
Bill Brown:
--- Quote from: Martin Weidmann on April 23, 2026, 10:10:45 AM ---On the one hand we have just had three LNs basically saying "once Oswald was dead nobody cared about the authenticity of the evidence".
Which of course means that they just threw bits and pieces together to wrap the case around an already dead man who couldn't defend himself.
--- End quote ---
--- Quote from: Martin Weidmann on April 23, 2026, 10:15:03 AM ---Don't you understand how idiotic that sounds?
But to follow your thinking; who cares if the jacket found under a car belongs to Oswald. Let's just say it does and make it easier to call him guilty. Is that what you are saying?
--- End quote ---
First, I didn't say anything about the weapon, the bullets or the shell casings. I only referred to the jacket, as far as the authorities feeling no need to pursue a chain of custody.
Secondly, I said what I said and I did not say what I did not say. Make sense?
Michael Capasse:
--- Quote from: Bill Brown on April 23, 2026, 11:49:49 AM ---I only referred to the jacket, as far as the authorities feeling no need to pursue a chain of custody.
--- End quote ---
IOW - NO need to validate a piece evidence.
One of the dumbest things I have ever heard a nutter say. lame.
Martin Weidmann:
--- Quote from: Bill Brown on April 23, 2026, 11:49:49 AM ---First, I didn't say anything about the weapon, the bullets or the shell casings. I only referred to the jacket, as far as the authorities feeling no need to pursue a chain of custody.
Secondly, I said what I said and I did not say what I did not say. Make sense?
--- End quote ---
I also didn't say anything about the weapon, bullets and shell casings.
I also was only talking about the jacket. You know, the jacket that was described as being white by the officer who called in the find. The grey jacket that several officers marked despite the fact that they were not and could not have been in the chain of custody, and the same grey jacket that the FBI spent days on visiting some 400 dry cleaners in the greater Dallas and New Orleans area to track down a label found in the jacket.
Secondly, I said what I said and I did not say what I did not say. Make sense?
You also frequently say what you don't say... Does that make sense?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version