I've given up trying to persuade you. All I can do is point out your silliness.
No. You can't support your arguments. You say it is impossible for a right to left path exiting on the left side of JFK’s tie knot to miss the back of JBC when he is turned as he is at z193. Without providing any figures or specifying where my model is inaccurate, you throw up your hands and say it is impossible. That’s not a way to attack an argument. So I can see why you are giving up.
If you were to be serious about challenging my assertion that a shot through JFK’s midline at z193 missed JBC’s back on the left side as being impossible, you would be able to tell us:
1. what the maximum right to left angle of the bullet trajectory is at z193
2. what the maximum distance JFK’s midline is from the right side of the car.
3. what the minimum distance JBC’s right armpit is from the right side of the car
4. the maximim angle that JBC is turned at z193 (please explain how you determine this)
5. the maximum distance between the spines of two men.
My model provides the trajectory based on where the car, rifle, and the two men are at z193. So I have done all that. I can give you all the distances these distances from my model.