Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Gov. John Connally Grips His White Stetson Hat at Z-272  (Read 71639 times)

Online Andrew Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2086
    • SPMLaw
Re: Gov. John Connally Grips His White Stetson Hat at Z-272
« Reply #462 on: Today at 03:06:21 PM »
I've given up trying to persuade you. All I can do is point out your silliness.
No. You can't support your arguments.  You say it is impossible for a right to left path exiting on the left side of JFK’s tie knot to miss the back of JBC when he is turned as he is at z193. Without providing any figures or specifying where my model is inaccurate, you throw up your hands and say it is impossible. That’s not a way to attack an argument.  So I can see why you are giving up.

If you were to be serious about challenging my assertion that a shot through JFK’s midline at z193 missed JBC’s back on the left side as being impossible, you would be able to tell us:
1. what the maximum right to left angle of the bullet trajectory is at z193
2. what the maximum distance JFK’s midline is from the right side of the car.
3. what the minimum distance JBC’s right armpit is from the right side of the car
4. the maximim angle that JBC is turned at z193 (please explain how you determine this)
5. the maximum distance between the spines of two men.

My model provides the trajectory based on where the car, rifle, and the two men are at z193. So I have done all that. I can give you all the distances these distances from my model.
« Last Edit: Today at 03:26:34 PM by Andrew Mason »

Online John Corbett

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2185
Re: Gov. John Connally Grips His White Stetson Hat at Z-272
« Reply #463 on: Today at 03:52:48 PM »
No. You can't support your arguments.  You say it is impossible for a right to left path exiting on the left side of JFK’s tie knot to miss the back of JBC when he is turned as he is at z193. Without providing any figures or specifying where my model is inaccurate, you throw up your hands and say it is impossible. That’s not a way to attack an argument.  So I can see why you are giving up.

If you were to be serious about challenging my assertion that a shot through JFK’s midline at z193 missed JBC’s back on the left side as being impossible, you would be able to tell us:
1. what the maximum right to left angle of the bullet trajectory is at z193
2. what the maximum distance JFK’s midline is from the right side of the car.
3. what the minimum distance JBC’s right armpit is from the right side of the car
4. the maximim angle that JBC is turned at z193 (please explain how you determine this)
5. the maximum distance between the spines of two men.

My model provides the trajectory based on where the car, rifle, and the two men are at z193. So I have done all that. I can give you all the distances these distances from my model.

Your model does not even pass the eyeball test. Not only do you grossly exaggerate JBC's shoulder turn, you also have him leaning toward the right side of the car to get him out of the way of the bullet exiting JFK's throat. On top of that, you keep his left leg flared out in an unnatural position for someone who you showing making and extreme turn to the right. It is a joke as anyone who compares Z193 to your goofy drawing can easily see. The fact you have to exaggerate JBC's position to make your theory seem possible demonstrates that it is not.
« Last Edit: Today at 03:58:20 PM by John Corbett »