That Is Not Officer Haygood = Conspiracy! Prove Me Wrong Challenge

[John Corbett]

   "Hold any water"? Why do you think the Officer Haygood making a 2nd trip into the railroad yard was suddenly cooked up after 62+ years? It is in response to my have attached a rock solid 12:38 PM Timeline to the Darnell still frame showing Officer Harkness, + Buddy Walthers, + The Alleged Officer Haygood. I have been banging away at the "That Ain't Haygood" issue for 2 yrs now. My recent discoveries of the documented Officer Harkness 12:36 radio transmission, and Inspector Sawyer NOT arriving at the TSBD until 12:35 PM, are the straws that broke this camel's back. "That Ain't Haygood" = Conspiracy has 'em scrambling.

In 35 years of dealing with conspiracy hobbyists, your the first one who I've ever come across who even made an issue about Haygood. What reason would anyone else have had to cook up an explanation for Haygood's movements. You are a cult of one with your fixation about this. Nobody else cares. And nobody else ever will.

[Royell Storing]

In 35 years of dealing with conspiracy hobbyists, your the first one who I've ever come across who even made an issue about Haygood. What reason would anyone else have had to cook up an explanation for Haygood's movements. You are a cult of one with your fixation about this. Nobody else cares. And nobody else ever will.

   You just saw how important, "That Ain't Haygood", is with the baseless claim now being made that Haygood made a 2nd trip into the railroad yard and that 2nd trip is what Darnell filmed. And you also fail to comprehend the ramifications of an Unknown Motorcycle Cop roaming across the railroad yard immediately after the kill shot.  The entirely baseless claim of Haygood making a 2nd trip into the railroad yard is indicative of a Defcon 1 setting. LN's understand that the fact proven "That Ain't Haygood" discovery is seismic. 

[John Corbett]

   You just saw how important, "That Ain't Haygood",

Because you say so.

is with the baseless claim now being made that Haygood made a 2nd trip into the railroad yard and that 2nd trip is what Darnell filmed.

You take the silly position that if we can't prove the officer in the Darnell film is Haygood, then it couldn't have been Haygood. If there is no proof who the officer is in the Darnell film, then it is illogical to conclude that it is not Haygood. Your "evidence" is that Haygood is seen earlier with two gloves on and the officer in the Darnell film only has one glove on. As if that establishes it could not be Haygood. As if Haygood would have had no reason to take one of his gloves off. If you are going to demand we prove why Haygood would have taken a glove off, don't you need a reason for the officer in the Darnell film to have taken one of his gloves off? Why does one need proof and not the other?

And you also fail to comprehend the ramifications of an Unknown Motorcycle Cop roaming across the railroad yard immediately after the kill shot.  The entirely baseless claim of Haygood making a 2nd trip into the railroad yard is indicative of a Defcon 1 setting. LN's understand that the fact proven "That Ain't Haygood" discovery is seismic.

You have proven nothing but your own inability to understand what constitutes proof. You have not proven that officer is not Haygood. At best, you have established that the officer's identity is an open question which means it might or might not be Haygood. Even if it is not Haygood, it just means that some other unidentified cop went into the rail yard. That is a long way from being proof of a conspiracy, but since you have no real evidence of a conspiracy, you latch on to nonsense such as this.