The Brown Paper Bag

[Martin Weidmann]

In October of '64, Frazier was clearly saying that the rifle was in the bag.  You don't have to like it.

Sure, Bill... Whatever you say, Bill.  Pffffff

It makes of course complete sense (not) for Frazier to deny that the bag was large enough to conceal a rifle from day one, then suddenly sign an "affidavit" saying the opposite and then go back to maintain his old position for the next 60 years.

But as you believe the WC BS, we already know that you are easily fooled, so why wouldn't you believe this nonsense as well, right?

[John Mytton]

Sure, Bill... Whatever you say, Bill.  Pffffff

It makes of course complete sense (not) for Frazier to deny that the bag was large enough to conceal a rifle from day one, then suddenly sign an "affidavit" saying the opposite and then go back to maintain his old position for the next 60 years.

But as you believe the WC BS, we already know that you are easily fooled, so why wouldn't you believe this nonsense as well, right?

...and then go back to maintain his old position for the next 60 years.

I can't blame him, you conspiracy Kooks theorists are psychotic and have badgered Frazier continually, as you say "for the next 60 years", he had no choice, otherwise you people would have made his life HELL!

JohnM

[Michael Capasse]

In October of '64, Frazier was clearly saying that the rifle was in the bag.  You don't have to like it.

Never said it before and hasn't said it since.
Lame.

[Martin Weidmann]

Never said it before and hasn't said it since.
Lame.

It merely shows the level of desperation at the LN side. They know they can't win the argument by debate and honest treatment of the evidence, so they come up with crap like this.

LHs never back up the bogus claims they make. Bill Brown is not going to produce a confirmation of Buell Frazier because he will never get one.