The Brown Paper Bag

[Bill Brown]

I found that "evidence" at the Ripley "believe or not" website years ago, but feel free to prove that the documents are authentic.

No one cares what or when you found anything.

Along with Frank Badalson, I had pizza with Buell Frazier and Dave Perry last November.  There's nothing fake about the affidavits.

[Martin Weidmann]

No one cares what or when you found anything.

Along with Frank Badalson, I had pizza with Buell Frazier and Dave Perry last November.  There's nothing fake about the affidavits.

Should be easy to prove it then. Just ask Buell to confirm it. Beyond that, nobody cares who you claim to have eaten pizza with.

Btw; Frazier and/or the notary didn't know that Erwin was actually Irving?

And what was the notary's name exactly? The signature isn't very clear.

[Michael Capasse]

Like it or not, Frazier states, in the affidavit, that the rifle was in the bag and therefore by default he is telling you that the bag was large enough.

  "Frazier states..." lol
Or was it simply put in front of him to sign for additional color to the provenance of the car?

[Bill Brown]

Should be easy to prove it then. Just ask Buell to confirm it. Beyond that, nobody cares who you claim to have eaten pizza with.

Btw; Frazier and/or the notary didn't know that Erwin was actually Irving?

And what was the notary's name exactly? The signature isn't very clear.

Surely you've heard Buell Frazier talk before, with that VERY strong accent.  The fact that the affidavit says "Erwin" instead of Irving should make it obvious to you that Frazier was talking as the transcriber was typing it out.  Use your common sense.

As for the pizza, my point was that we talked about the affidavit.  Out of respect for Dave Perry (Buell's friend and who set up the pizza night), I won't tell you what was said.  However, I had a video call with Perry last Monday and I'm trying to get Perry to agree to release the details of the conversation with Frazier.

This is what you'd call FREAL research, i.e. going straight to the horse's mouth (as opposed to doing what YOU do, which is simply call it fake and ignore it).

[Martin Weidmann]

Surely you've heard Buell Frazier talk before, with that VERY strong accent.  The fact that the affidavit says "Erwin" instead of Irving should make it obvious to you that Frazier was talking as the transcriber was typing it out.  Use your common sense.

As for the pizza, my point was that we talked about the affidavit.  Out of respect for Dave Perry (Buell's friend and who set up the pizza night), I won't tell you what was said.  However, I had a video call with Perry last Monday and I'm trying to get Perry to agree to release the details of the conversation with Frazier.

This is what you'd call FREAL research, i.e. going straight to the horse's mouth (as opposed to doing what YOU do, which is simply call it fake and ignore it).

Hilarious,

This so-called affidavit lacks the normal form for these documents, doesn't identify the notary, and was allegedly drawn up in Dallas and you argue they wouldn't have know that Erwin was in fact Irving? And as far as common sense goes, there isn't a notary in the country that will blindly sign an affidavit without checking the content of the document.

As for the pizza, my point was that we talked about the affidavit.  Out of respect for Dave Perry (Buell's friend and who set up the pizza night), I won't tell you what was said.  However, I had a video call with Perry last Monday and I'm trying to get Perry to agree to release the details of the conversation with Frazier.

This is what you'd call FREAL research, i.e. going straight to the horse's mouth (as opposed to doing what YOU do, which is simply call it fake and ignore it).

Oh please, give it up already, you hypocrite. You won't tell us what was said, yet here you are posting those crappy documents and basically claiming that Frazier said they were authentic.

And talking about "real research", do you really think you are the only one who has ever spoken to Frazier? The difference between you and me is you make claims about it.

It's obvious that you clearly can not authenticate those papers. That's the only reason for this song and dance.

[Tom Graves]

Point being, in October of '64, Buell Frazier acknowledged that the assassination weapon was in the package and his car transported the rifle to the Depository building.  He even says that Oswald finalized his plans to carry out the assassination in that car.

Like it or not, Frazier states, in the affidavit, that the rifle was in the bag and therefore by default he is telling you that the bag was large enough.

If he knew those things at the time, then Frazier, IMHO, was an accomplice.

[Zeon Mason]

And does BW Frazier agree NOW, in the year 2026, that the rifle was in the package he saw Oswald carry into the TSBD annexed warehouse bldg?

Or was Frazier still a very scared young man in 1964 who had just a year earlier been thru an interrogation with Fritz where  Frazier thought Fritz was about to strike him in the face.?

[John Mytton]

Or was Frazier still a very scared young man in 1964 who had just a year earlier been thru an interrogation with Fritz where  Frazier thought Fritz was about to strike him in the face.?

You hit the nail on the head.
As soon as Frazier heard the shots, he instantly knew it was Oswald, when Frazier went back inside the Depository he went to eat his lunch all alone in the basement? WTF?
Then after he left in the early afternoon, Frazier went to visit his Stepfather in Hospital?
Then we have Linnie Mae Randle's initial confession to the FBI that the package was three feet long, almost the same size as the one in evidence, how would she know the size of some random paper bag with Oswald's prints which was found in Oswald's sniper's nest?







JohnM