In what way? She was fairly consistent on one thing.
If one witness can be wrong, two can be wrong. There is also the very reel possibility that Frazier and his sister discussed the bag between themselves which could have influenced their recollections.The simple reality is neither of the two had any reason to estimate the length of the package at the time they observed it. They were only asked to estimate the length of the package from memory some time later.
She gave two different lengths. You don't see that in itself as a problem?Are you gonna cherry pick the one you want?
The discussion is about consistent. Start from the ground up. What did she say? Interesting you would gravitate to her estimation of the length as if that was all defining.
I don't play games. You know exactly what she said.Make you point
Yes you do. nothing but. And so do you, so why the pretense?
I won't play a nutters baiting gameyou have a point? make it