WOW, you make up a brief self serving scenario and leave out a ton of detail, detail that in reality a prosecution would present, evidence that would convict Oswald. Pathetic!
1. Oswald took what looked to be a heavy looking long brown paper package to work.
2. Oswald lied about taking a long brown paper package to work.
3. Oswald put the unwieldly long brown paper package on the back seat of Frazier's car.
4. Oswald lied about putting his brown paper package on the back seat of Frazier's car.
5. Oswald's prints were on the brown paper package.
6. Oswald's rifle was on the 6th floor.
7. Oswald prints were on the rifle on the 6th floor.
8. Oswald's "fresh" prints were on the recently moved sniper's nest rifle rest box.
9. Oswald's prints were on the top box orientated down Elm street, the location Kennedy was when struck.
10. Oswald fled the building immediately and therefore was in flight from the scene of his crime.
11. Oswald got on and off a bus within a couple of minutes, another example of flight.
12. Oswald got a cab and got out way past his rooming house.
13. Oswald killed a cop, why on Earth would an innocent Oswald need to kill a cop?
14. Oswald when arrested tried to kill more cops, a innocent man has no need to kill a cop.
15. Oswald lied about owning a rifle. Consciousness of guilt
16. Oswald lied about living on Neely Street. Place of incriminating photographic evidence
17. Oswald lied about authenticated backyard photos which show him holding the murder weapon.
So Mr Defence how do you refute this tiny slice of the MOUNTAIN of Evidence?? Or will you go back to your conspiracy theorist roots and say everyone lied! LOL!
Like I said you haven't got a clue!
JohnM
1. Oswald took what looked to be a heavy looking long brown paper package to work.
Oswald took a paper bag to work. Just how "heavy looking long" was never determined or proven
2. Oswald lied about taking a long brown paper package to work.
Depends on what Oswald considered to be a "long paper package". Why didn't they show the actual 6th floor bag to him?
3. Oswald put the unwieldly long brown paper package on the back seat of Frazier's car.
Do you think that you keep using the term "long brown paper package" makes your argument less pathetic?
4. Oswald lied about putting his brown paper package on the back seat of Frazier's car.
Really? Where exactly did he say that?
5. Oswald's prints were on the brown paper package.
Even if there was a print from Oswald on that bag, what does that prove? The bag was made from TSBD materials and was found at the TSBD at a place where Oswald worked.
6. Oswald's rifle was on the 6th floor.
"Oswald's rifle" LOL
7. Oswald prints were on the rifle on the 6th floor.
The FBI examined the rifle in the night following the assassination and found no prints
8. Oswald's "fresh" prints were on the recently moved sniper's nest rifle rest box.
9. Oswald's prints were on the top box orientated down Elm street, the location Kennedy was when struck.
Oh well, you've got me there. He must be guilty, right? But wait... where was Oswald working that morning? And his job was moving boxes, right.....
10. Oswald fled the building immediately and therefore was in flight from the scene of his crime.
11. Oswald got on and off a bus within a couple of minutes, another example of flight.
12. Oswald got a cab and got out way past his rooming house.
If true (nobody saw him leave, right?), how does this prove that he went to Irving to collect a rifle from Ruth Paine's garage?
13. Oswald killed a cop, why on Earth would an innocent Oswald need to kill a cop?
Why would Oswald even be at 10th and Patton if he was on the run. And claiming he killed a cop is just that: a claim.
14. Oswald when arrested tried to kill more cops, a innocent man has no need to kill a cop.
So, now you know his mindset when he was arrested at the Texas Theater
15. Oswald lied about owning a rifle. Consciousness of guilt
Unless he did not own a rifle to begin with
16. Oswald lied about living on Neely Street. Place of incriminating photographic evidence
Did he? But if he did, perhaps he understood by then that he was being set up.
Did you ever find out how the FBI was able to show a BY photo to Michael Paine on Friday evening to find out where the photo was taken, when the BY photos were not found until Saturday afternoon? And how did Fritz manage to show Oswald a blow up of a BY photo on Saturday morning?
17. Oswald lied about authenticated backyard photos which show him holding the murder weapon.
There is nothing authenticated about the BY photos. All you have is opinions...
Obviously, nothing of any of this provides support for the claim that Oswald went to Irving to collect a rifle from the Paine garage, took that rifle to the TSBD in a bag that was too small for the rifle to find in (a bag that is disputed by the main witness who actually saw it) and used that rifle to shoot Kennedy.
So Mr Defence how do you refute this tiny slice of the MOUNTAIN of Evidence?? Or will you go back to your conspiracy theorist roots and say everyone lied! LOL!
Where exactly is that so-called "Mountain of Evidence"?
Like I said you haven't got a clue!
Any idiot who thinks that a jury will only get the prosecution side to consider and come up with a "beyond reasonable doubt" conclusion, is just that: An idiot!
