JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
The Brown Paper Bag
Tom Graves:
--- Quote from: Martin Weidmann on April 10, 2026, 04:58:16 AM ---Don't mistake me for a conspiracy theorist.
All I ever asked for and all I ever wanted to see is the conclusive evidence showing Oswald's guilt.
It is obvious that if Oswald was set up or innocent, that there must have been a conspiracy. That's a logical conclusion, but not one I am interested in.
If there ever was a conspiracy, there is no way in hell anybody can prove that conclusively after so many years.
So, let's just stick to providing the conclusive evidence of Oswald's guilt, shall we? You provide it and if it is indeed conclusive, that's all I ever wanted to know. Do we have a deal?
--- End quote ---
In other words, you've fabricated a very comfy position for your "it must have been a conspiracy" self.
Well done!
Martin Weidmann:
--- Quote from: Tom Graves on April 10, 2026, 05:20:24 AM ---In other words, you've fabricated a very comfy position for your "it must have been a conspiracy" self.
Well done!
--- End quote ---
Where did I say that it must have been a conspiracy? Do you have a problem understanding what is written?
Why don't you just stop making stuff up and provide the conclusive evidence to show that Oswald was guilty?
Tom Graves:
--- Quote from: Martin Weidmann on April 10, 2026, 05:27:02 AM ---Where did I say that it must have been a conspiracy? Do you have a problem understanding what is written?
Why don't you just stop making stuff up and provide the conclusive evidence to show that Oswald was guilty?
--- End quote ---
It seems to me you're saying, "In spite of all of the evidence against Oswald in the Warren Commission Report (which would have taken oodles and gobs of bad guys to fabricate), I'm pretty sure Oswald didn't do it, and I will continue to believe that until you come up with a photo or film showing him in the window and a notarized confession."
Martin Weidmann:
--- Quote from: Tom Graves on April 10, 2026, 05:38:21 AM ---It seems to me you're saying, "In spite of all of the evidence against Oswald in the Warren Commission Report (which would have taken oodles and gobs of bad guys to fabricate), I'm pretty sure Oswald didn't do it, and I will continue to believe that until you come up with a photo or film showing him in the window and a notarized confession."
--- End quote ---
And you got all this BS from the simple fact that all I am asking for is to be presented with conclusive evidence of his guilt?
Oh boy.... no wonder you are a LN
Just a quick question. When you say;
all of the evidence against Oswald in the Warren Commission Report
Are you talking about the evidence that doesn't support the conclusions and claims in the report?
Or am I missing something?
I'm pretty sure Oswald didn't do it, and I will continue to believe that
Again, where did I say that I'm pretty sure Oswald didn't do it? That would imply a preconceived conclusion based on feeling instead of applying the concept of being "innocent until proven guilty"
until you come up with a photo or film showing him in the window and a notarized confession."
Stop being dramatical! Can you place Oswald in the sniper's nest when the shots were fired or not?
Martin Weidmann:
Duplicate
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version