The Brown Paper Bag

[Martin Weidmann]

You are reading more into his statement that is there. Carrying the package under his arm does not preclude the top end sticking up above his shoulder. Frazier was non-specific about what parts of the package you could or couldn't see.

You do understand that if the bag contained a broken down rifle and the package was held by Oswald in the cup of his hand, the top of the package would have reached higher than Oswald's head?

Frazier said he couldn't see "much of the package". Go figure...

The desperate way that you try to exclude Frazier's statements is a clear indication that you already know that you've lost the argument. Now all you need to do is accept it!

[Michael Capasse]

You are reading more into his statement that is there. Carrying the package under his arm does not preclude the top end sticking up above his shoulder.

WHAT ??

[Jack Nessan]

Here's Frazier on 11/22 and for the next 60+ years:
"I noticed that Lee had the package in his right hand under his arm, and the package was straight up and down, and he had his arm down, and you could not see much of the package."   https://jfk-online.com/frazier.html

He doesn't need to be a "super witness" to know exactly what he saw and it is not every detail.
It is very specific and consistent. You're the one that continues to deny that.

What about Linnie Mae Randle or doesn't her statement and testimony count?

[Michael Capasse]

What about Linnie Mae Randle or doesn't her statement and testimony count?

What about it?
Her statements conflict with her testimony.

[John Corbett]

What about Linnie Mae Randle or doesn't her statement and testimony count?

If one witness can be wrong, two can be wrong. There is also the very reel possibility that Frazier and his sister discussed the bag between themselves which could have influenced their recollections.

The simple reality is neither of the two had any reason to estimate the length of the package at the time they observed it. They were only asked to estimate the length of the package from memory some time later.

[Jack Nessan]

What about it?
Her statements conflict with her testimony.

In what way? She was fairly consistent on one thing.

[Michael Capasse]

If one witness can be wrong, two can be wrong. There is also the very reel possibility that Frazier and his sister discussed the bag between themselves which could have influenced their recollections.

The simple reality is neither of the two had any reason to estimate the length of the package at the time they observed it. They were only asked to estimate the length of the package from memory some time later.

Yet, Here is a picture of Frazier demonstrating to you exactly what he saw and even should have seen...
You are just not being honest.