The Brown Paper Bag

[John Mytton]

The gentleman doth protest too much, methinks.

Did I hit a nerve, Johnny? Hilarious!

Ah yes, Vincent Baxter... that was the name I couldn't remember. He stepped in whenever you left for some time and disappeared as soon as you returned. Probably a coincidence, though.

I'll have to ask it again; what's it like to have someone like me living rent free in your head for years?

Just how obsessed do you have to be with someone to actually keep files of postings of or about him on a public forum?

When I log out, John Mytton is gone, until I return, because I know (just like this time, after  returned from not posting for months because I have a life) he will be waiting for me.

Poor, Poor Martin, you've made almost Three Thousand more posts than me, that's some life you must have!? Hahahahahaha!

And what drew me back was not you, you silly deluded narcissistic fool,(just check my history) but Neidernut, who encouraged me to return to my 9/11 research, and then I destroyed his feeble beliefs which made him leave in disgrace, see ya later Alligator, and then I started to read Royell's posts and decided to dismantle his good natured ramblings, so yeah there are certain personalities that I enjoy debating.
And as for you, you made some self serving statement how you didn't brag about "supposedly" leaving America but in doing so you were bragging, you are such a Dumbass! No one needed to know where and when you "supposedly" left because no one gives a Stuff! And ever since I offended you with a little reality you have been following me around like a demented retarded sick puppy. You are so easy to manipulate! Hilarious.
 
JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

Poor, Poor Martin, you've made almost Three Thousand more posts than me, that's some life you must have!? Hahahahahaha!

And what drew me back was not you, you silly deluded narcissistic fool,(just check my history) but Neidernut, who encouraged me to return to my 9/11 research, and then I destroyed his feeble beliefs which made him leave in disgrace, see ya later Alligator, and then I started to read Royell's posts and decided to dismantle his good natured ramblings, so yeah there are certain personalities that I enjoy debating.
And as for you, you made some self serving statement how you didn't brag about "supposedly" leaving America but in doing so you were bragging, you are such a Dumbass! No one needed to know where and when you "supposedly" left because no one gives a Stuff! And ever since I offended you with a little reality you have been following me around like a demented retarded sick puppy. You are so easy to manipulate! Hilarious.
 
JohnM

Yes, I hit a nerve (again) 

[Tom Graves]

The case was wrapped around Oswald from the beginning.

Okay, so Oswald's landlady's saying under penalty of perjury that she saw him wearing a jacket when he left the rooming house, and a jacket's being found under a car close to where Tippit's murderer (identified as Oswald) was seen fleeing, and the fact that Oswald wasn't wearing a jacket when he was arrested a few minutes later in the Texas Theater was all "evidence" that was fabricated and planted against him, right?

[John Mytton]

It was taken on 11-22-63, as it says clearly on the back of the picture....see the link HERE.

More here:
https://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/2010/07/frazier-randle-and-paper-bag.html

Thanks David, in researching that photo, I was just on your site earlier today and saw that you discovered that little gem and was going to post it here to further educate Capasse.
Anyway, to anyone who's reading this, CT's and LNers alike and want to investigate, research and learn some interesting JFKA facts go and enjoy DVP's excellent site!!
https://jfk-archives.blogspot.com/

JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

Okay, so Oswald's landlady's saying she saw him wearing a light-colored jacket when he left the rooming house, and a jacket's being found under a car close to where Tippit's murderer was seen fleeing, and the fact that Oswald wasn't wearing a jacket when he was arrested a few minutes later in the Texas Theater is all fabricated and planted evidence against him, right?

Oswald's landlady didn't say she saw him wearing a light-colored jacket. In her affidavit of December 5, 1963 she described the jacket as having a dark color. And in her WC testimony she was shown the grey jacket and she couldn't recognize it because the jacket "he put on was darker".

It would be nice if you at least try to get your facts correct before asking me this question.

The remainder of your question assumes up front that Oswald killed Tippit, ran from the scene and dumped his jacket (which somehow had turned white) and then was arrested without a jacket.
All this rests on the testimony of Earlene Roberts who claimed Oswald left zipping up a jacket, whilst at the same time saying she wasn't paying much attention as you was trying to get the TV working. Ever considered the possibility that Oswald did not leave the rooming house wearing a jacket and went straight to the Texas Theater?

As for the grey jacket, there is an interesting tale about that as well, as there is evidence that actually suggests that jacket was in Irving on Friday morning and not in Oak Cliff.

Have I confused you enough? Perhaps you should try to look beyond the BS that the WC has told you.

Btw, when Frazier says he wasn't paying much attention to the package Oswald was carrying, that means for the LNs he must be wrong about what he saw, but when Roberts says she wasn't paying much attention to the jacket, whatever she said is written in stone by the LNs. You see the double standard? Probably not, I suppose.

[John Mytton]

Yes, I hit a nerve (again) 

JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

JohnM

The poor boy can't help himself.....

Is the nerve still hurting?

[John Mytton]

The poor boy can't help himself.....

Is the nerve still hurting?

 

A sock puppet among us?
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,4306.0.html

JohnM