JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Robert Groden claims has original Wiegman film, says Prayerman is not LHO
Royell Storing:
--- Quote from: Duncan MacRae on April 01, 2026, 09:48:36 AM ---So...Using your illogical logic, this genuine Oswald photographed at different times in this two photo composite, might or might not be the genuine Oswald?
--- End quote ---
There is no mystery as to the Oswald ID on the 2 images you have posted. Other than with Ralphy. There is a total mystery shroud covering the ID of Prayer Man/Lady. You failed to mention that the images you posted were captured 30 minutes apart. I took the Kamp/Lovelady ID apart with images that were captured within seconds of each other. This is Not the case with what you posted. The time gap between your images should have been made clear to the audience.
Royell Storing:
Was just reading a Kamp "Face Book" posting. Kamp is now trashing Groden. The jackals are turning on each other. Not pretty.
Duncan MacRae:
--- Quote from: Royell Storing on April 01, 2026, 02:02:34 PM ---There is a total mystery shroud covering the ID of Prayer Man/Lady. You failed to mention that the images you posted were captured 30 minutes apart. I took the Kamp/Lovelady ID apart with images that were captured within seconds of each other. This is Not the case with what you posted. The time gap between your images should have been made clear to the audience.
--- End quote ---
??? Pay attention, you missed my point.
There's no mystery concerning who it is not, it is not Oswald, that is all we need to know.
The identity of the Female which would be interesting to know is not important.
In the Wiegman Willis comparison, the time taken between photographs is not relevant or necessary to submit an opinion of the mystery person's Female gender
John Corbett:
--- Quote from: Duncan MacRae on April 01, 2026, 02:43:29 PM ---??? Pay attention, you missed my point.
There's no mystery concerning who it is not, it is not Oswald, that is all we need to know.
The identity of the Female which would be interesting to know is not important.
In the Wiegman Willis comparison, the time taken between photographs is not relevant or necessary to submit an opinion of the mystery person's Female gender
--- End quote ---
You hit the nail on the head. As long was we know it is not Oswald, it doesn't matter who it is. The photo would only have significance if it was Oswald and it could be proven it was taken seconds, not minutes after the assassination. That would have huge ramifications if true but since it is not, it's nothing more than a mildly interesting photo.
Royell Storing:
--- Quote from: Duncan MacRae on April 01, 2026, 02:43:29 PM ---??? Pay attention, you missed my point.
There's no mystery concerning who it is not, it is not Oswald, that is all we need to know.
The identity of the Female which would be interesting to know is not important.
In the Wiegman Willis comparison, the time taken between photographs is not relevant or necessary to submit an opinion of the mystery person's Female gender
--- End quote ---
Your declaring there is "no mystery" does not make this so. There's plenty of males that look like Prayer Man. Plugging a male "look alike" into that same spot would Not prove that Prayer Man is a man either. Your "look alike" plug-in female is actual "proof" of nothing. I thought you were claiming the 2 images you posted were of the same female. Now THAT, would have been proof. Prayer Man has become Kamp's flag ship issue and until he waves the white flag, that issue will remain alive and kicking contrary to your declaration. We need to keep the "Proof Bar' high and not impose a double standard depending on which side of the issue the proffer is coming from.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version