JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Mark Lane and Charles Brehm
Marjan Rynkiewicz:
--- Quote from: Fred Litwin on March 19, 2026, 03:21:10 PM ---No, not true. Go read my post. Lane asked him exactly where the shots came from, and he cut out the answer.
fred
--- End quote ---
Yes. Brehm said many times that he thort the shots came from X or Y.
But hav a closer look at his wordage. Only once did he ever say where he heard the shots coming from. And that was from a building that was not the TSBD.
In fact Brehm explains this himself.... he explains that he heard the shots coming from a building but that he formed the opinion that they came from the TSBD.
John Corbett:
Every jiggle is not proof of a gunshot but every gunshot will be followed by a jiggle. This was established back in the 1960s during the filming of hunting shows. Even thought the cameramen knew shots were going to be fired, they couldn't hold their camera steady immediately following the shots.
We have solid evidence of when the two shots were fired that struck JFK and we can see camera jiggles about 1/3 second after those shots were fired. I have not claimed that the Z158 jiggle is proof positive of a gunshot 1/3 second before, but given that it preceded Connally's visible reaction at Z164 when he began to turn to look over his right shoulder, it is a strong indication. It is possible the shot was fired earlier but that would have us believe Connally reacted very slowly to the first shot. So did Rosemary Willis. I find it far more likely that the shot was fired at or about Z152. It's the best fit for the reactions of Connally and Willis.
Duncan MacRae:
--- Quote from: John Corbett on March 20, 2026, 11:42:32 AM ---Every jiggle is not proof of a gunshot but every gunshot will be followed by a jiggle.
--- End quote ---
//www.youtube.com/watch?v=oO-kg49AuxY
Tom Graves:
--- Quote from: Duncan MacRae on March 20, 2026, 11:45:57 AM ---//www.youtube.com/watch?v=oO-kg49AuxY
--- End quote ---
Zapruder didn't resume filming until Z-133 (after a 17-second pause), so he missed Oswald's first shot half-a-second earlier.
Royell Storing:
--- Quote from: John Corbett on March 20, 2026, 11:42:32 AM ---Every jiggle is not proof of a gunshot but every gunshot will be followed by a jiggle. This was established back in the 1960s during the filming of hunting shows. Even thought the cameramen knew shots were going to be fired, they couldn't hold their camera steady immediately following the shots.
We have solid evidence of when the two shots were fired that struck JFK and we can see camera jiggles about 1/3 second after those shots were fired. I have not claimed that the Z158 jiggle is proof positive of a gunshot 1/3 second before, but given that it preceded Connally's visible reaction at Z164 when he began to turn to look over his right shoulder, it is a strong indication. It is possible the shot was fired earlier but that would have us believe Connally reacted very slowly to the first shot. So did Rosemary Willis. I find it far more likely that the shot was fired at or about Z152. It's the best fit for the reactions of Connally and Willis.
--- End quote ---
Yeah, those "hunting shows" are bona fide Proof. Admitted as "evidence" in courtrooms across the USA. Coupled with the alleged "Jiggle" from a man with admitted balance issues, you gotta "slam dunk" going here. Proffering this kinda stuff is indicative of just how weak of a case that you got going.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version