Podcast On Tippit

[John Mytton]

Sure Oswald was a Gorilla, Hilarious!

No he wasn't. That's why it is likely or possible that the white jacket found at the car park wasn't his.

Wow, in 2026, you claim to own two of that type of jacket, please take a photo of the two jackets and show us the two elastic gathered sections on the back and I hope they're a light grey/beige shade! Then post them in this thread. Waiting....Zzzzzz...

Hilarious. Who do you think you are?

You make one idiotic claim after another and never present a shred of evidence.

I'm not going to do a damned thing until you have explained how Oswald could have picked up CE 162 (the light grey jacket) at the rooming house, when he, as you claimed was wearing that same jacket to the TSBD on Friday morning and left the TSBD without wearing a jacket.

I'm not going to do a damned thing...

Say it's not true, yet another Weidmann personal anecdote that he uses as proof, can't be another one of his lies?



JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

Obviously, not that well.

Oswald put it there.

You can't be this thick?? Oswald clearly wore the dark jacket but Frazier didn't even notice, yet as I said "your star witness with the photographic memory had never seen CE163 ever before", even though he sat right next to him for the half hour trip from Irving, but you expect him to remember some insignificant action with precise detail. Did your Mother drop you on your head when you were a baby?



Mr. BALL - I have here Commission's 163, a gray blue jacket. Do you recognize this jacket?
Mr. FRAZIER - No, sir; I don't.
Mr. BALL - Did you ever see Lee Oswald wear this jacket?
Mr. FRAZIER - No, sir; I don't believe I have.

 

Before you go balls to the walls, take a second or two to read and comprehend what's written, so you can be less of an embarrasment, otherwise you'll fall into another one of my traps. Muhahaha.

BTW, how are those jacket photos coming along?
Because I believe you I really do, Oswald's jacket was clearly mass produced and there must be at least hundreds out there, but there was also millions and millions of jackets produced and the problem here is a simple case of probability, for your killer to possess and discard a virtually identical jacket in a carpark that a jacketed Oswald was also seen entering, is pretty far fetched.

Oswald arrested without his jacket. Where did it go?


JohnM

The fool looks at two photographs in which the elastics on one jacket are clearly further apart than on the other one and he declares the jackets to be the same based on his biased self-serving opinion. Even worse, based up what he pathetically calls "research" he concludes that these jackets are the only two in the entire world that are the same. And then he wants to be taken seriously.

But at least you've ran away from your previous bogus claim that Oswald was wearing CE 162 to the TSBD on Friday morning. Of course he didn't. He was wearning CE 162 to Irving on Thursday afternoon and left the next morning with CE 163.

[Martin Weidmann]

Say it's not true, yet another Weidmann personal anecdote that he uses as proof, can't be another one of his lies?



JohnM

I have seldom seen you so desperate to back away from your own pathetic claims.

[John Mytton]

The fool looks at two photographs in which the elastics on one jacket are clearly further apart than on the other one and he declares the jackets to be the same based on his biased self-serving opinion. Even worse, based up what he pathetically calls "research" he concludes that these jackets are the only two in the entire world that are the same. And then he wants to be taken seriously.

But at least you've ran away from your previous bogus claim that Oswald was wearing CE 162 to the TSBD on Friday morning. Of course he didn't. He was wearning CE 162 to Irving on Thrusday afternoon and left the next morning with CE 163.

I've got you really rattled as you are resorting to making the most absurd claims and making up things I never even remotely said? Your World is falling down all around you and it's Hilarious.

in which the elastics on one jacket are clearly further apart than on the other one

Well Weidmann, let's put that to the test, on the jacket on the left we can easily see the elastic and the subsequent gathering of the material above and on the jacket on the right we can clearly see the gathered fabric above and therefore we can determine where the elastic would be.
The end of the sleave is a relative constant size, which I've called "W" and in both images the distance between the elastic sections is Wx2.
Thanks for making this proof even stronger and your demise even sweeter.



JohnM

[Michael Capasse]

JohnM

  you added a mark to the white jacket over the portion in doubt.
double jackets, double wallets, uh oh oswald doubles too..?

[Martin Weidmann]

I've got you really rattled as you are resorting to making the most absurd claims and making up things I never even remotely said? Your World is falling down all around you and it's Hilarious.

Well Weidmann, let's put that to the test, on the jacket on the left we can easily see the elastic and the subsequent gathering of the material above and on the jacket on the right we can clearly see the gathered fabric above and therefore we can determine where the elastic would be.
The end of the sleave is a relative constant size, which I've called "W" and in both images the distance between the elastic sections is Wx2.
Thanks for making this proof even stronger and your demise even sweeter.



JohnM

I've got you really rattled as you are resorting to making the most absurd claims and making up things I never even remotely said?

So, you didn't say this;

OMG WOW!
After going through my collection of images I found a photo of the rear of Oswald's jacket and the similarity to the carpark photo is even more striking, at both ends across the back of Oswald's jacket we see a small elastic section where the fabric is gathered and allowed to stretch so as to provide a snug fit around the mid-section, this design is seen in both photos!!
To confirm the uniqueness of this find,........

Well Weidmann, let's put that to the test, on the jacket on the left we can easily see the elastic and the subsequent gathering of the material above and on the jacket on the right we can clearly see the gathered fabric above and therefore we can determine where the elastic would be.
The end of the sleave is a relative constant size, which I've called "W" and in both images the distance between the elastic sections is Wx2.
Thanks for making this proof even stronger and your demise even sweeter.

So now you figure that the two photos actually show exactly the same size of the jackets?

You're looking at two photo and are desperately trying to make a point but failing miserably. But, what else is new?

You really need to get that desperation of yours under control.