Podcast On Tippit

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
Mitch Todd

Author Topic: Podcast On Tippit  (Read 8780 times)

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8172
Re: Podcast On Tippit
« Reply #91 on: April 13, 2026, 05:18:54 PM »
AHA!!! So you finally acknowledge that eyewitness testimony is less than reliable in establishing facts. We are making progress here.

What are you babbling about. I have always said that eyewitness testimony is the least reliable form of evidence.
But that doesn't mean that all eyewitnesses are always wrong.


Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8172
Re: Podcast On Tippit
« Reply #92 on: April 13, 2026, 05:19:28 PM »
Duplicate
« Last Edit: April 13, 2026, 05:32:16 PM by Martin Weidmann »

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8172
Re: Podcast On Tippit
« Reply #93 on: April 13, 2026, 05:28:21 PM »
Wow, another wall of text of mainly self serving guesses!

But one thing that's new is you're saying that the jacket found under the car was probably put under the car by the killer, so how do most of the witnesses, who saw the killer and say the jacket was a light coloured grey or beige suddenly becomes a white jacket? WOW!

BTW I like your story of how Oswald's jacket was the same type and style as the one seen being held by the Policeman in the video and then back at headquarters some dishonest Policeman who had access to the evidence room and was aware of all the collected evidence, somehow mysteriously swaps Oswald's jacket for the one in evidence, what are the chances that the Jackets are almost the same colour, same style and appear to be the same size. Let me tell you the chances are not good and it's just another product of a CT's wet dream. Do the math, indeed!

The more you try to create a narrative for your massive conspiracy, the more unwieldly, illogical and frankly ridiculous it becomes.

JohnM

But one thing that's new is you're saying that the jacket found under the car was probably put under the car by the killer,

It is a plausible assumption.

so how do most of the witnesses, who saw the killer and say the jacket was a light coloured grey or beige suddenly becomes a white jacket? WOW!

Well, as you always claim, sunlight can cause the color to be different because of shade and depending from where you look and how far away you are.

Btw which witnesses said the jacket was light colored grey or beige?

BTW I like your story of how Oswald's jacket was the same type and style as the one seen being held by the Policeman in the video

Was it? I didn't say it was the same type and style. That's just your imagination filling in the blanks in a biased manner as per usual.
But it certainly looked similar but I've only seen a photo of the back side and there is no way to make the determination you want to make but can not support!

what are the chances that the Jackets are almost the same colour, same style and appear to be the same size.

Were they? Did you examine both jackets or are you just making this stuff up?

The more you try to create a narrative for your massive conspiracy, the more unwieldly, illogical and frankly ridiculous it becomes.

My massive conspiracy? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
« Last Edit: April 13, 2026, 05:37:38 PM by Martin Weidmann »

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8172
Re: Podcast On Tippit
« Reply #94 on: April 13, 2026, 05:31:26 PM »


JohnM

As I said, you don't understand what I mean with "conclusive evidence"!

I have never used the term "absolute, 100% certainty". As per usual you are jumping to a completely wrong conclusion.

But feel free to keep on google searches to find stuff like this to fit what you have misrepresented I allegedly said but never really did.

Who knows you might even find something to help you claim that the word "conclusive" is the same as "100% certainty".   Thumb1:
« Last Edit: April 13, 2026, 05:41:45 PM by Martin Weidmann »

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8172
Re: Podcast On Tippit
« Reply #95 on: April 13, 2026, 05:33:03 PM »
Duplicate
« Last Edit: April 13, 2026, 05:35:50 PM by Martin Weidmann »

Online John Corbett

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 379
Re: Podcast On Tippit
« Reply #96 on: April 13, 2026, 07:26:12 PM »
What are you babbling about. I have always said that eyewitness testimony is the least reliable form of evidence.
But that doesn't mean that all eyewitnesses are always wrong.

It means we shouldn't assume what they have told us is factual if it cannot be corroborated.

Online Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2028
Re: Podcast On Tippit
« Reply #97 on: April 14, 2026, 01:07:58 AM »
That's one hell of a memory. Identifying a person who walked past her at a fast pace, some two months earlier, from a photograph.

Or could the two months of massive media exposure and finger pointing at Oswald have something to do with it?

Scoggings, who identified Oswald in a line up couldn't identify him from a photo the next day...... Something wrong in paradise methinks!

Quote
That's one hell of a memory. Identifying a person who walked past her at a fast pace, some two months earlier, from a photograph.

Or could the two months of massive media exposure and finger pointing at Oswald have something to do with it?

You're accusing Mary Brock of telling the FBI that Oswald was the guy who ran past her in a jacket for no other reason than it was known by this time (2 months later) that Oswald was the alleged assassin and cop-killer.  This would be mighty low of Mary Brock.  What evidence do you have to support this?

Quote
Scoggings, who identified Oswald in a line up couldn't identify him from a photo the next day...... Something wrong in paradise methinks!

Please post whatever you have which suggests that Oswald, when running past Scoggins with a gun in his hands, looked exactly like he did in the photo shown to Scoggins.

------------

See what I did here?  Same thing you are doing.  If you can do it, than I can do it.