JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Podcast On Tippit
John Mytton:
--- Quote from: Martin Weidmann on April 13, 2026, 04:41:09 PM ---So, again, let me get this straight, without you having any legal expertise you feel that you can refute legal claims and school people on the law and legal standards?.
I just gave you an example of when you foolishly kept asking for "conclusive evidence" and claimed it was required to arrive at "Beyond all reasonable doubt"
You simply don't understand that "conclusive evidence" means that the evidence is authenticated. Once again you are in way over your head. Not surprising though, as you deny having any legal knowledge at all. :D
--- End quote ---
JohnM
Martin Weidmann:
--- Quote from: John Corbett on April 13, 2026, 04:20:59 PM ---AHA!!! So you finally acknowledge that eyewitness testimony is less than reliable in establishing facts. We are making progress here.
--- End quote ---
What are you babbling about. I have always said that eyewitness testimony is the least reliable form of evidence.
But that doesn't mean that all eyewitnesses are always wrong.
Martin Weidmann:
Duplicate
Martin Weidmann:
--- Quote from: John Mytton on April 13, 2026, 05:11:46 PM ---Wow, another wall of text of mainly self serving guesses!
But one thing that's new is you're saying that the jacket found under the car was probably put under the car by the killer, so how do most of the witnesses, who saw the killer and say the jacket was a light coloured grey or beige suddenly becomes a white jacket? WOW!
BTW I like your story of how Oswald's jacket was the same type and style as the one seen being held by the Policeman in the video and then back at headquarters some dishonest Policeman who had access to the evidence room and was aware of all the collected evidence, somehow mysteriously swaps Oswald's jacket for the one in evidence, what are the chances that the Jackets are almost the same colour, same style and appear to be the same size. Let me tell you the chances are not good and it's just another product of a CT's wet dream. Do the math, indeed!
The more you try to create a narrative for your massive conspiracy, the more unwieldly, illogical and frankly ridiculous it becomes.
JohnM
--- End quote ---
But one thing that's new is you're saying that the jacket found under the car was probably put under the car by the killer,
It is a plausible assumption.
so how do most of the witnesses, who saw the killer and say the jacket was a light coloured grey or beige suddenly becomes a white jacket? WOW!
Well, as you always claim, sunlight can cause the color to be different because of shade and depending from where you look and how far away you are.
Btw which witnesses said the jacket was light colored grey or beige?
BTW I like your story of how Oswald's jacket was the same type and style as the one seen being held by the Policeman in the video
Was it? I didn't say it was the same type and style. That's just your imagination filling in the blanks in a biased manner as per usual.
But it certainly looked similar but I've only seen a photo of the back side and there is no way to make the determination you want to make but can not support!
what are the chances that the Jackets are almost the same colour, same style and appear to be the same size.
Were they? Did you examine both jackets or are you just making this stuff up?
The more you try to create a narrative for your massive conspiracy, the more unwieldly, illogical and frankly ridiculous it becomes.
My massive conspiracy? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Martin Weidmann:
--- Quote from: John Mytton on April 13, 2026, 05:13:15 PM ---
JohnM
--- End quote ---
As I said, you don't understand what I mean with "conclusive evidence"!
I have never used the term "absolute, 100% certainty". As per usual you are jumping to a completely wrong conclusion.
But feel free to keep on google searches to find stuff like this to fit what you have misrepresented I allegedly said but never really did.
Who knows you might even find something to help you claim that the word "conclusive" is the same as "100% certainty". Thumb1:
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version