JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Podcast On Tippit
Martin Weidmann:
--- Quote from: John Mytton on April 13, 2026, 12:57:45 AM ---Why do you insist on being so stupid and dishonest, she said the jacket she was shown was relatively darker than the one she saw Oswald zipping up at the rooming house. But the most relevant memory she has is the zipping action, something understandably that stuck with her!
Because you realize how important her testimony is you have tried every pathetic attempt to try and discredit her. Like I said you are simply an angry, bitter old man who hates Women! Misogynist!
Mr. BALL. I'll show you this jacket which is Commission Exhibit 162---have you ever seen this jacket before?
Mrs. ROBERTS. Well, maybe I have, but I don't remember it. It seems like the one he put on was darker than that. Now, I won't be sure, because I really don't know, but is that a zipper jacket?
Just because one grey is darker than another, doesn't instantly categorize it as "Dark", you must be the dumbest person to ever walk the Earth!!
And shades are powerfully reflected by the contrast of the environment. The centre bar when surrounded by varying shades appears to be itself different shades but it's a constant colour.
Grow a brain you idiot!
JohnM
--- End quote ---
Why do you insist on being so stupid and dishonest, she said the jacket she was shown was relatively darker than the one she saw Oswald zipping up at the rooming house.
Did you ever read her affidavit of 12/5/1963? I doubt it, because than you wouldn't have exposed your ignorance!
Because you realize how important her testimony is you have tried every pathetic attempt to try and discredit her.
Her testimony (if true) is indeed important, but you have it backwards. It's pretty obvious to any sane person that Roberts isn't a reliable witness, but idiots like you desperately need her testimony to keep your pathetic narrative alive that you will say anything you can to salvage the wreckage of her statements and thus expose yourself as a dishonest fool with an agenda.
Like I said you are simply an angry, bitter old man who hates Women! Misogynist!
Oh boy, so much anger....
you must be the dumbest person to ever walk the Earth!!
More insults from a petty keyboard junkie.... I'm really sad that little Johnny doesn't like me (not really :D)
John Mytton:
--- Quote from: Martin Weidmann on April 13, 2026, 12:33:24 AM ---Since when is zipping up a jacket unusual?
I repeat; there is evidence that shows that the grey jacket was in Irving and could not have been at the rooming house on Friday morning. As Oswald had only two jackets and one of those was found at the TSBD, while Frazier described the jacket Oswald was wearing on Thursday afternoon as being grey, can you explain how the grey jacket could have been at the rooming house the next day?
--- End quote ---
--- Quote ---Frazier described the jacket Oswald was wearing on Thursday afternoon as being grey
--- End quote ---
Try Again!
--- Quote from: Martin Weidmann on April 10, 2026, 11:03:51 AM ---Actually, eye witness testimony is the worst kind of evidence.
--- End quote ---
--- Quote from: Martin Weidmann on March 26, 2019, 09:46:01 PM --- And it is common knowledge that eyewitnesses frequently get all sorts of details wrong,
--- End quote ---
Ouch!
JohnM
Martin Weidmann:
--- Quote from: John Mytton on April 13, 2026, 01:09:43 AM ---Try Again!
Ouch!
JohnM
--- End quote ---
Except of course when the witness' name is Earlene Roberts, right?
But let's see if you want to play. We know from Marina that Oswald had two jackets; one grey one and one dark-grey one. The latter was found at the TSBD and thus must have been the jacket that Oswald was wearing on Friday.
According to Frazier, Oswald was wearing a grey jacket on the trip to Irving on Thursday.
So, how could the grey jacket have been at the rooming house in Oak Cliff on the next day?
When you figure it out, let me know!
John Mytton:
--- Quote from: Martin Weidmann on April 13, 2026, 01:16:11 AM ---Except of course when the witness' name is Earlene Roberts, right?
But let's see if you want to play. We know from Marina that Oswald had two jackets; one grey one and one dark-grey one. The latter was found at the TSBD and thus must have been the jacket that Oswald was wearing on Friday.
According to Frazier, Oswald was wearing a grey jacket on the trip to Irving on Thursday.
So, how could the grey jacket have been at the rooming house in Oak Cliff on the next day?
When you figure it out, let me know!
--- End quote ---
Very near the Tippit crime scene, Oswald was seen entering a carpark and his jacket was found under a car, the jacket was initialled by various law officers and the FBI forensic examiner, to maintain a chain of custody.
The jacket was filmed at the scene and this jacket was positively identified by his wife.
Stombaugh confirms his initials on evidence was designated by his initials PMS.
Mr. EISENBERG. "PMS" being your initials, Paul M. Stombaugh?
Mr. STOMBAUGH. Yes, sir.
Mr. RANKIN. 162?
Mrs. OSWALD. That is Lee's--an old shirt.
Mr. RANKIN. Sort of a jacket?
Mrs. OSWALD. Yes.
JohnM
Zeon Mason:
So who actually found the jacket under the car?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version