JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate

Podcast On Tippit

<< < (6/31) > >>

Martin Weidmann:

--- Quote from: Tommy Shanks on March 17, 2026, 04:07:21 PM ---This has nothing whatsoever to do with Oswald's murder of Tippit, the evidence for which is beyond overwhelming.

--- End quote ---

Nobody said it had anything to do with Oswald or Tippit. But it does show just how unreliable witness identification and testimony is.

You didn't understand that?

Didn't you just say something about 'critical thinking'? Are you sure you should be using such words?

Martin Weidmann:
Text deleted

John Corbett:

--- Quote from: Martin Weidmann on March 17, 2026, 07:51:21 PM ---Don't have to have one. It's a silly question that contains assumptions about the evidence.

Only a superficial look at the "evidence" would cause such a question being asked.

--- End quote ---

By assumptions, you mean assumptions that the evidence is genuine?

I guess it is more fun to dream up excuses to disregard the evidence and imagine scenarios unburdened by what has been.

Martin Weidmann:

--- Quote from: John Corbett on March 17, 2026, 08:24:32 PM ---By assumptions, you mean assumptions that the evidence is genuine?

I guess it is more fun to dream up excuses to disregard the evidence and imagine scenarios unburdened by what has been.

--- End quote ---

By assumptions, you mean assumptions that the evidence is genuine?

Wow, did you figure that out by yourself?

I guess it is more fun to dream up excuses to disregard the evidence

Is it? What excuses have I made to disregard the evidence?

and imagine scenarios unburdened by what has been.

Pray tell, what exactly has been and how do you know? Let me guess, by blindly and with no questions asked accepting "the evidence"..... Right?

Martin Weidmann:
Why do posts duplicate as a quote?

This is the second text that I had to delete.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version