Did Austin Miller just See Steam?

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
Wayne Green, Gerry Down

Author Topic: Did Austin Miller just See Steam?  (Read 215 times)

Offline Michael Capasse

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 695
Re: Did Austin Miller just See Steam?
« Reply #8 on: Today at 12:08:26 AM »
Smelling gunpowder is not an indication of where the gunshots came from. Unless someone wants to argue that the shots were actually fired by someone on Elm St., we can conclude that the smell of gunpowder had traveled some distance from the source of the gunfire. That doesn't establish where the shots were fired from. Fortunately, we have ample evidence of for that. The shots were fired from the southeast corner window of the 6th floor of the Texas School Book Depository. There is no credible evidence of any shots fired from any other location.

 :D we're talking about the smell of smoke that lingered in the air.
Unlike constant steam in a pressurized pipe that would dissipate

Online Mitch Todd

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1069
Re: Did Austin Miller just See Steam?
« Reply #9 on: Today at 12:25:39 AM »
:D we're talking about the smell of smoke that lingered in the air.
Unlike constant steam in a pressurized pipe that would dissipate
Because when a gun fires, the smoke lingers in the same spot for hours, even days. Sometimes years!  :D :D :D

Offline Michael Capasse

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 695
Re: Did Austin Miller just See Steam?
« Reply #10 on: Today at 12:36:17 AM »
Because when a gun fires, the smoke lingers in the same spot for hours, even days. Sometimes years!  :D :D :D

Who said that?
How do u see steam from a pressurized pipeline?

« Last Edit: Today at 12:44:38 AM by Michael Capasse »

Online Fred Litwin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 569
Re: Did Austin Miller just See Steam?
« Reply #11 on: Today at 12:58:06 AM »
Actually, S. M. Holland said the smoke lingered...and that is the exact word he used...

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3204
Re: Did Austin Miller just See Steam?
« Reply #12 on: Today at 01:18:50 AM »
Starting At Video Time 1.24


Is it true, as Comrade Lane says near the end of the clip, that "The vast majority of witnesses who expressed an opinion as to the origin of the shots agreed with Mr. Holland that the shot did come from behind the fence"?
« Last Edit: Today at 01:20:10 AM by Tom Graves »

Online Mitch Todd

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1069
Re: Did Austin Miller just See Steam?
« Reply #13 on: Today at 01:41:10 AM »
Who said that?
How do u see steam from a pressurized pipeline?
I'm being sarcastic. In my own experience, gunsmoke (which is mostly steam, anyway) dissipates almost instantaneously.

Offline Duncan MacRae

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 559
    • JFK Assassination Photographs
Re: Did Austin Miller just See Steam?
« Reply #14 on: Today at 08:33:03 AM »
Actually, S. M. Holland said the smoke lingered...and that is the exact word he used...

Holland used both of the terms "Smoke" and "Steam"

Starting at 1.12



Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4710
Re: Did Austin Miller just See Steam?
« Reply #15 on: Today at 02:18:22 PM »
Actually, S. M. Holland said the smoke lingered...and that is the exact word he used...

    That steam pipe is not close to the area of the picket fence that Skinny Holland said he saw smoke. Let's get that straight. I don't believe that Wiegman Film still frame shows smoke. But trying to attach that steam pipe to the Holland story is stretching things.