Gunman in the pergola window...

[Royell Storing]

  This is exactly why this murder remains unsolved after 62+ years. YOU believe what you selectively want to believe and then just dismiss everything else. Like buying into a bullet striking the traffic signal without a shred of evidence to support that having happened. You rubber stamp whatever  suits your fancy.   

[Paul J Cummings]

Hi Royell, he believes Witt. Besides Witts dumbass testimony, the same umbrella he claimed to have for 15 years didn't match the photos in Dealey Plaza. pffft

[John Mytton]

Hi Royell, he believes Witt. Besides Witts dumbass testimony, the same umbrella he claimed to have for 15 years didn't match the photos in Dealey Plaza. pffft

the same umbrella he claimed to have for 15 years didn't match the photos in Dealey Plaza

That's real interesting, in what way did the umbrella that Witt brought to the House Select Committee hearings differ to the Umbrella took by Witt to Dealey Plaza?





At Dealey Plaza





An Umbrella to protest Kennedy was seen long before Witt!



And what do you think that Witt attempted to achieve by deceiving the World 15 years later?
Or do you think like many others that the umbrella seen in Dealey Plaza was a "secret weapon"? "pffft" indeed!



JohnM

[John Corbett]

  This is exactly why this murder remains unsolved after 62+ years. YOU believe what you selectively want to believe and then just dismiss everything else. Like buying into a bullet striking the traffic signal without a shred of evidence to support that having happened. You rubber stamp whatever  suits your fancy.

The murder was solved by the DPD in the first 12 hours when they formally charged Oswald with the murder. Everything we've learned since then has only bolstered the case against Oswald. Just because an army of conspiracy hobbyists have refused to accept the overwhelming proof of Oswald's guilt doesn't mean the murder hasn't been solved. Convincing a cult that they are wrong is an impossible task. No amount of proof will ever satisfy them. Not only is the proof of Oswald's guilt absolute, in 62 years of trying, the conspiracy cult has failed to come up with a scrap of credible evidence that anyone other than Oswald took part in the crime. That won't stop them from trying.

[Royell Storing]

    You have been sucked into using the word 'Cult" when it does Not apply. A "MAJORITY" is Not a "Cult". You are parroting babble.

[Tommy Shanks]

  This is exactly why this murder remains unsolved after 62+ years. YOU believe what you selectively want to believe and then just dismiss everything else. Like buying into a bullet striking the traffic signal without a shred of evidence to support that having happened. You rubber stamp whatever  suits your fancy.

Not sure who you are replying to but you're flailing aimlessly as usual, since I've never said a word about bullets or traffic signals, nor am I "selectively" believing anything. I simply don't believe your poppycock about impostor policemen and enormous getaway cars, and I absolutely do not believe your "analysis" of the Umbrella Man's actions in Dealey Plaza, which match perfectly fine with Witt's HSCA testimony.

[Royell Storing]

Well actually, Umbrella Man has never been a high priority to me because having a guy with an Umbrella making an obvious political statement makes far more sense than using the umbrella as a signal or heaven help us a concealed blow dart, but whatever.
Anyway, Witt's facial structure and body type 15 years later is still an extremely close match for Umbrella Man and the fact that he remembers most of what happened without a pedantic level of detail, in my opinion paints a picture of a normal bloke trying his best to remember a tiny slice of time from a decade and a half ago. Consider if Witt was some JFK fanatic who knew every detail with pinpoint accuracy then that all by itself would be powerful evidence of an impostor.
It reminds me of the eyewitnesses at the assassination, they all viewed an unexpected event once whereas the modern researcher has a ton of points of view from films and photos which they have studied over and over with microscopic detail but when some eyewitness makes some sort of a relatively insignificant error they are dragged over the coals for it? Go figure?

Getting back to the point of this post, when I grabbed the cropped image, I quickly checked the Bronson 8mm film and forgot that Bronson was also taking photographs and snapped the following photo a half second before the Limo reached Witt(my bad), before Bronson a literal second later swapped back to his movie camera.



JohnM

    SHANKS -  How does the above image "match perfectly fine" with the Witt HSCA Testimony as YOU claim? You obviously have not thoroughly read the Witt testimony. The above image proves both Witt and YOU are wrong.

[Tommy Shanks]

The above image proves both Witt and YOU are wrong.

Not even close. Your photo analysis skills are comically bad, man. Any wonder why nobody else on this forum believes your BS?