JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Gunman in the pergola window...
Paul J Cummings:
Hi Royell, he believes Witt. Besides Witts dumbass testimony, the same umbrella he claimed to have for 15 years didn't match the photos in Dealey Plaza. pffft
John Mytton:
--- Quote from: Paul J Cummings on April 07, 2026, 01:40:58 AM ---Hi Royell, he believes Witt. Besides Witts dumbass testimony, the same umbrella he claimed to have for 15 years didn't match the photos in Dealey Plaza. pffft
--- End quote ---
--- Quote ---the same umbrella he claimed to have for 15 years didn't match the photos in Dealey Plaza
--- End quote ---
That's real interesting, in what way did the umbrella that Witt brought to the House Select Committee hearings differ to the Umbrella took by Witt to Dealey Plaza?
At Dealey Plaza
An Umbrella to protest Kennedy was seen long before Witt!
And what do you think that Witt attempted to achieve by deceiving the World 15 years later?
Or do you think like many others that the umbrella seen in Dealey Plaza was a "secret weapon"? "pffft" indeed!
JohnM
John Corbett:
--- Quote from: Royell Storing on April 07, 2026, 01:09:12 AM --- This is exactly why this murder remains unsolved after 62+ years. YOU believe what you selectively want to believe and then just dismiss everything else. Like buying into a bullet striking the traffic signal without a shred of evidence to support that having happened. You rubber stamp whatever BS: suits your fancy.
--- End quote ---
The murder was solved by the DPD in the first 12 hours when they formally charged Oswald with the murder. Everything we've learned since then has only bolstered the case against Oswald. Just because an army of conspiracy hobbyists have refused to accept the overwhelming proof of Oswald's guilt doesn't mean the murder hasn't been solved. Convincing a cult that they are wrong is an impossible task. No amount of proof will ever satisfy them. Not only is the proof of Oswald's guilt absolute, in 62 years of trying, the conspiracy cult has failed to come up with a scrap of credible evidence that anyone other than Oswald took part in the crime. That won't stop them from trying.
Royell Storing:
You have been sucked into using the word 'Cult" when it does Not apply. A "MAJORITY" is Not a "Cult". You are parroting babble.
Tommy Shanks:
--- Quote from: Royell Storing on April 07, 2026, 01:09:12 AM --- This is exactly why this murder remains unsolved after 62+ years. YOU believe what you selectively want to believe and then just dismiss everything else. Like buying into a bullet striking the traffic signal without a shred of evidence to support that having happened. You rubber stamp whatever BS: suits your fancy.
--- End quote ---
Not sure who you are replying to but you're flailing aimlessly as usual, since I've never said a word about bullets or traffic signals, nor am I "selectively" believing anything. I simply don't believe your poppycock about impostor policemen and enormous getaway cars, and I absolutely do not believe your "analysis" of the Umbrella Man's actions in Dealey Plaza, which match perfectly fine with Witt's HSCA testimony.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version