JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Education Forum Moderated by Anti-Semitic Crackpot---John Simkin is Aware
Tommy Shanks:
--- Quote from: Dr. William Niederhut on March 11, 2026, 03:59:51 AM ---Same old bogus Michael Griffith propaganda tropes about Prouty. These have been debunked in detail by Prouty archivist Len Osanic, and Prouty historian Jeff Carter. As for Griffith's official status as a WCR critic, is it a limited hangout?
--- End quote ---
Are you accusing Michael Griffith of being paid to post on this board? Can't you just go back to your own forum and leave everybody here alone?
Dr. William Niederhut:
Well, so much for Grok's "intelligence."
The fraudulent NIST report never explained the abrupt free fall demolition of WTC7.
Nor did they explain the visible explosive pulverization of the Twin Towers and liquefied steel.
Grok gets an "F" in 9/11 Science 101.
As for Michael Griffith, where does he work?
Fred Litwin:
why was Wilkinson's string deleted at the education forum?
Tom Graves:
--- Quote from: Dr. William Niederhut on March 11, 2026, 08:24:15 PM ---Where does Michael Griffith work?
--- End quote ---
Dear Bill,
It's amazing just how devious those sons of guns at the KGB I mean the CIA are!
-- Tom
PS My bad. As I'm sure you would agree, the KGB* is a world-class humanitarian organization compared to the evil, evil CIA!
*Today's SVR and FSB
Dr. William Niederhut:
Hi, Fred.
John Simkin has asked us to not discuss 9/11 on the JFKA board.
Wilkinson raised the subject in the context of the false accusations that I am an Anti-Semite.
I did go to the trouble today of starting a new thread on our 9/11 board for people-- including Wilkinson, Ben Cole, and Michael Griffith-- who still don't understand the 9/11 science data.
https://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/32001-911-science-101-for-beginners/
I should point out that these Anti-Truthers (above) have not studied physics or chemistry at a collegiate or post-graduate level.
In Griffith's case, disinformation is a job.
As for Grok-- it's merely regurgitating the ubiquitous government disinformation on the internet.
It's a GIGO model. Garbage-In-Garbage-Out.
Cheers.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version