Unwanted Science: Scientific Evidence Against the JFK Autopsy Materials

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
Royell Storing, Harvey Brammer

Author Topic: Unwanted Science: Scientific Evidence Against the JFK Autopsy Materials  (Read 634 times)

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4717
That's exactly what I believe. I have no reason to believe otherwise.

Hanlon's Razor
Hanlon's Razor, also known as Occam's Razor, is a philosophical razor that suggests a way of eliminating unlikely explanations for human behavior. It is a heuristic tool that encourages people to consider alternative explanations for actions rather than to assume an intent to harm. The adage states: "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."

This maxim is especially true when we are talking about government operations. I say this as a retired government employee.

The JFK assassination was naturally a very stressful event for all. It is hardly surprising that in such a circumstance, fallible human beings would be more prone to making errors. Errors in judgement, errors of omission, etc. Everyone involved would have better served had they followed the same established and proven procedures that would be used in any other murder investigation. Instead, some people chose to deviate from the norm with less than satisfactory results. The selection of the autopsy team is a glaring example of that.

   "Stupidity"? There was nothing along the lines of "stupidity" with the WR written description of the JFK "BACK" wound being changed to the "base of the neck". This written change was made knowing that the JFK Autopsy Photos were sealed. And the guy making this change then eventually gets appointed VP and politically ascends to POTUS? With respect to your claim of "stupidity" being responsible for everything, there does come a straw that breaks the camel's back.
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 07:54:15 PM by Royell Storing »

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3212
"Stupidity"? There was nothing along the lines of "stupidity" with the WR written description of the JFK "BACK" wound being changed to the "base of the neck".

Dear Sonderführer Storing,

Do you think the measurements written down by Humes or Boswell (I can never remember which one) regarding the distances between the entrance wound in JFK's lower neck and the lower tip of his mastoid process and the tip of his shoulder blade were grossly inaccurate?

If so, do you think some evil, evil Deep State bad guy made them do that?

-- Tom
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 08:20:31 PM by Tom Graves »

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4717


   The JFK Autopsy Back Photo speaks for itself.   

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3212
The JFK Autopsy Back Photo speaks for itself.

Dear Sonderführer Storing,

What do the measurements speak for?

The evil, evil Deep State?

-- Tom

Online John Corbett

  • Subscriber
  • *
  • Posts: 41
   "Stupidity"? There was nothing along the lines of "stupidity" with the WR written description of the JFK "BACK" wound being changed to the "base of the neck". This written change was made knowing that the JFK Autopsy Photos were sealed. And the guy making this change then eventually gets appointed VP and politically ascends to POTUS? With respect to your claim of "stupidity" being responsible for everything, there does come a straw that breaks the camel's back.

Conspiracy hobbyists have been waiting for that straw for 62 years and are still grasping.

I have no idea why Gerald Ford wanted that change. It made no sense. The geometry of the wounds caused by the single bullet worked perfectly fine with an entry wound on the upper back. IOW, it was an act of stupidity.

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4717
Conspiracy hobbyists have been waiting for that straw for 62 years and are still grasping.

I have no idea why Gerald Ford wanted that change. It made no sense. The geometry of the wounds caused by the single bullet worked perfectly fine with an entry wound on the upper back. IOW, it was an act of stupidity.

   Some of us were around when Gerry Ford was a lowly Congressman. He was not a trail blazer back then or a late bloomer down the road. He was not a leader and would not have moved the WR written location of that wound on his own. Just not in him. LBJ put the WC together, and he did this after teaming up with J Edgar Hoover only days after the assassination. Ford was nothing more than a political foot soldier.