JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Unwanted Science: Scientific Evidence Against the JFK Autopsy Materials
John Corbett:
--- Quote from: Royell Storing on March 11, 2026, 07:26:09 PM --- "Stupidity"? There was nothing along the lines of "stupidity" with the WR written description of the JFK "BACK" wound being changed to the "base of the neck". This written change was made knowing that the JFK Autopsy Photos were sealed. And the guy making this change then eventually gets appointed VP and politically ascends to POTUS? With respect to your claim of "stupidity" being responsible for everything, there does come a straw that breaks the camel's back.
--- End quote ---
Conspiracy hobbyists have been waiting for that straw for 62 years and are still grasping.
I have no idea why Gerald Ford wanted that change. It made no sense. The geometry of the wounds caused by the single bullet worked perfectly fine with an entry wound on the upper back. IOW, it was an act of stupidity.
Royell Storing:
--- Quote from: John Corbett on March 12, 2026, 04:54:22 PM ---Conspiracy hobbyists have been waiting for that straw for 62 years and are still grasping.
I have no idea why Gerald Ford wanted that change. It made no sense. The geometry of the wounds caused by the single bullet worked perfectly fine with an entry wound on the upper back. IOW, it was an act of stupidity.
--- End quote ---
Some of us were around when Gerry Ford was a lowly Congressman. He was not a trail blazer back then or a late bloomer down the road. He was not a leader and would not have moved the WR written location of that wound on his own. Just not in him. LBJ put the WC together, and he did this after teaming up with J Edgar Hoover only days after the assassination. Ford was nothing more than a political foot soldier.
Tom Graves:
--- Quote from: John Corbett on March 12, 2026, 04:54:22 PM ---Conspiracy hobbyists have been waiting for that straw for 62 years and are still grasping.
I have no idea why Gerald Ford wanted that change. It made no sense. The geometry of the wounds caused by the single bullet worked perfectly fine with an entry wound on the upper back. IOW, it was an act of stupidity.
--- End quote ---
Does the small circle drawn on JFK's back jibe with the measurements written on the same document?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page
Go to full version