Unwanted Science: Scientific Evidence Against the JFK Autopsy Materials

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
Paul J Cummings

Author Topic: Unwanted Science: Scientific Evidence Against the JFK Autopsy Materials  (Read 529 times)

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4713
That's exactly what I believe. I have no reason to believe otherwise.

Hanlon's Razor
Hanlon's Razor, also known as Occam's Razor, is a philosophical razor that suggests a way of eliminating unlikely explanations for human behavior. It is a heuristic tool that encourages people to consider alternative explanations for actions rather than to assume an intent to harm. The adage states: "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."

This maxim is especially true when we are talking about government operations. I say this as a retired government employee.

The JFK assassination was naturally a very stressful event for all. It is hardly surprising that in such a circumstance, fallible human beings would be more prone to making errors. Errors in judgement, errors of omission, etc. Everyone involved would have better served had they followed the same established and proven procedures that would be used in any other murder investigation. Instead, some people chose to deviate from the norm with less than satisfactory results. The selection of the autopsy team is a glaring example of that.

   "Stupidity"? There was nothing along the lines of "stupidity" with the WR written description of the JFK "BACK" wound being changed to the "base of the neck". This written change was made knowing that the JFK Autopsy Photos were sealed. And the guy making this change then eventually gets appointed VP and politically ascends to POTUS? With respect to your claim of "stupidity" being responsible for everything, there does come a straw that breaks the camel's back.
« Last Edit: Today at 07:54:15 PM by Royell Storing »

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3208
"Stupidity"? There was nothing along the lines of "stupidity" with the WR written description of the JFK "BACK" wound being changed to the "base of the neck".

Dear Sonderführer Storing,

Do you think the measurements written down by Humes or Boswell (I can never remember which one) regarding the distances between the entrance wound in JFK's lower neck and the lower tip of his mastoid process and the tip of his shoulder blade were grossly inaccurate?

If so, do you think some evil, evil Deep State bad guy made them do that?

-- Tom
« Last Edit: Today at 08:20:31 PM by Tom Graves »

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4713


   The JFK Autopsy Back Photo speaks for itself.   

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3208
The JFK Autopsy Back Photo speaks for itself.

Dear Sonderführer Storing,

What do the measurements speak for?

The evil, evil Deep State?

-- Tom