JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Another sign that interest in the JFK assassination is waning
Tom Graves:
--- Quote from: Benjamin Cole on February 28, 2026, 05:34:12 AM ---TG--
That's my take on ~Z-295.
BC
--- End quote ---
Dear "BC,"
Z-295 isn't worthy of a "take."
Once again, I beseech you:
Please show us Connally's being "doubled over" by a shot, any shot, before Nellie pulled him down into her lap.
-- "TG"
Benjamin Cole:
TG-
Once again, that is my take on ~Z-295. Lines up with JBC's testimony too.
Caveat emptor, and draw your own conclusions.
Tom Graves:
--- Quote from: Benjamin Cole on February 28, 2026, 08:40:42 AM ---TG-
Once again, that is my take on ~Z-295. Lines up with JBC's testimony too.
Caveat emptor and draw your own conclusions.
--- End quote ---
Dear "BC,"
How accurate do you think Connally was when he, with typical gallantly and "confidence," was recounting how he was seriously wounded by the second of three unexpected shots at five-second intervals, and what he did or did not do before Nellie had the presence of mind to pull him down into her lap . . . and he lost consciousness?
John Connally was sorely (pardon the pun) mistaken, but charismatic politician that he was, sounded oh-so convincing!
LOL!
The only things he got right were:
1) the first loud boom was a rifle shot
2) he started turning his upper torso and head to his right at Z-160 to see over his shoulder where the shot had come from and whether or not JFK was okay
3) he was struck in the back (at approximately Z-222) as he was turning back towards the front
-- "TG"
Benjamin Cole:
TG-
Each to his own.
Tom Graves:
--- Quote from: Benjamin Cole on February 28, 2026, 11:44:04 AM ---TG-
Each to his own.
--- End quote ---
Why are you so gullible?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page
Go to full version