JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate

Another sign that interest in the JFK assassination is waning

<< < (4/10) > >>

Tommy Shanks:

--- Quote from: Royell Storing on February 25, 2026, 03:00:40 AM ---    There is both film and physical evidence proving the existence of "BIG FOOT".

--- End quote ---

An unintentional Quote Of The Year candidate from laughable amateur JFK assassination photo analyst Royell Storing...

Royell Storing:
  I welcome being taken out of context. It reveals how one sided in my favor the issue(s) under discussion is.
  I have supplied far more Evidence supporting: (1) "No Glove Cop", and, (2) "Car" traveling down the Elm St Extension while shot(s) were being fired vs (1) "Lost Bullet" having struck a traffic signal support beam while Zapruder was Not Filming. This matchup is a Mike Tyson TKO in Rd 1.   

Tom Graves:

--- Quote from: John Corbett on February 25, 2026, 04:27:20 PM ---An interesting article. In the past I have used the terms reflexive and cognitive to describe reactions where your article speaks of voluntary and involuntary. Unless I am misunderstanding, I think we are talking about the same thing. Cognitive reactions take longer and are a less reliable way of determining the timing of events because they involve a thought process and that can vary. For example, we see cognitive reactions by JBC and Rosemary Willis to the sound of the first shot. JBC's reaction began at frame 164 whereas Rosemary Willis' reaction began at about 171. I believe it was during filming of hunting programs, perhaps the American Sportsman, it was shown that a cameraman will jiggle his camera in reaction to the sound of a high-powered rifle shot. It is an involuntary reaction and one that will occur even when the cameraman is expecting the gunshot. The problem with applying jiggle analysis to the Zapruder film is that while every gunshot will be followed by a jiggle, not every jiggle is caused by a gunshot. It is my belief that the camera jiggle at frame 158 is a reaction to the first shot but I cannot prove that to be a fact.

--- End quote ---

Roselle and Scearce have JBC and Rosemary Willis reacting cognitively / voluntarily at Z-150 and Z-140, respectively.

Tom Graves:

--- Quote from: Royell Storing on February 25, 2026, 08:37:40 PM ---I have supplied far more evidence supporting the "no-glove policeman" bad guy and the 1958 Pontiac Bonneville Abandoned Getaway Car's traveling down Elm Street Extension while a shot or shots were being fired versus Max Holland's "Lost Bullet" having struck a traffic signal mast arm while Zapruder wasn't filming.

--- End quote ---

Dear Sonderführer Storing,

Max Holland is probably wrong that Oswald's first, missing-everything shot was fired at hypothetical "Z-107" and glanced off the traffic signal's mast arm, but since Elsie Dorman said she temporarily stopped filming right after she heard the first shot, he's still right that said shot was fired before Zapruder resumed filming (after a 17-second pause) at Z-133.

Roselle and Scearce are almost certainly right that, based on the conscious / voluntary reaction times of seven prime witness, Oswald's first shot was at hypothetical "Z-124," i.e., half-a-second before Zapruder resumed filming.

https://d7922adf-f499-4a26-96d4-8ab2d521fa35.usrfiles.com/ugd/d7922a_e280e26982b44f2c97c6e6e27026e385.pdf

-- Tom

Royell Storing:

  So you automatically attach that possible early shot/Lost Bullet to the sniper's nest? You've "jumped the shark" right outta the box.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version