Another sign that interest in the JFK assassination is waning

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Another sign that interest in the JFK assassination is waning  (Read 4376 times)

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5008
Re: Another sign that interest in the JFK assassination is waning
« Reply #14 on: February 25, 2026, 04:40:02 PM »
How does a photograph establish that a car was rolling down the Elm St. extension and what is your evidence the photo was taken during the shooting?

Even if we accept your premises of the car on the Elm St. extension and a motorcycle cop in the railroad yard, how would either of those prove a conspiracy?

      What "photograph" are you referencing above?  With respect to image evidence, I use Assassination Films and still frames from those films. Both the "getaway" car and the "No Glove Cop" are extremely involved stories.  A broad based JFK Assassination Foundation is mandatory to understand how my 2 discoveries "prove a conspiracy". For starters, I ask that you familiarize yourself with the Officer Haygood WC Testimony. We can then begin to discuss my "No Glove Cop" discovery after that. This is why these 2 discoveries have been missed for 62+ years. People just do not want to put the work in. Are you willing to put the work in?

Offline Tommy Shanks

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 213
Re: Another sign that interest in the JFK assassination is waning
« Reply #15 on: February 25, 2026, 08:02:55 PM »
    There is both film and physical evidence proving the existence of "BIG FOOT".

An unintentional Quote Of The Year candidate from laughable amateur JFK assassination photo analyst Royell Storing...

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5008
Re: Another sign that interest in the JFK assassination is waning
« Reply #16 on: February 25, 2026, 08:37:40 PM »
  I welcome being taken out of context. It reveals how one sided in my favor the issue(s) under discussion is.
  I have supplied far more Evidence supporting: (1) "No Glove Cop", and, (2) "Car" traveling down the Elm St Extension while shot(s) were being fired vs (1) "Lost Bullet" having struck a traffic signal support beam while Zapruder was Not Filming. This matchup is a Mike Tyson TKO in Rd 1.   
« Last Edit: February 25, 2026, 08:38:30 PM by Royell Storing »

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3495
Re: Another sign that interest in the JFK assassination is waning
« Reply #17 on: February 25, 2026, 08:50:31 PM »
An interesting article. In the past I have used the terms reflexive and cognitive to describe reactions where your article speaks of voluntary and involuntary. Unless I am misunderstanding, I think we are talking about the same thing. Cognitive reactions take longer and are a less reliable way of determining the timing of events because they involve a thought process and that can vary. For example, we see cognitive reactions by JBC and Rosemary Willis to the sound of the first shot. JBC's reaction began at frame 164 whereas Rosemary Willis' reaction began at about 171. I believe it was during filming of hunting programs, perhaps the American Sportsman, it was shown that a cameraman will jiggle his camera in reaction to the sound of a high-powered rifle shot. It is an involuntary reaction and one that will occur even when the cameraman is expecting the gunshot. The problem with applying jiggle analysis to the Zapruder film is that while every gunshot will be followed by a jiggle, not every jiggle is caused by a gunshot. It is my belief that the camera jiggle at frame 158 is a reaction to the first shot but I cannot prove that to be a fact.

Roselle and Scearce have JBC and Rosemary Willis reacting cognitively / voluntarily at Z-150 and Z-140, respectively.
« Last Edit: February 25, 2026, 08:51:50 PM by Tom Graves »

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3495
Re: Another sign that interest in the JFK assassination is waning
« Reply #18 on: February 25, 2026, 09:14:50 PM »
I have supplied far more evidence supporting the "no-glove policeman" bad guy and the 1958 Pontiac Bonneville Abandoned Getaway Car's traveling down Elm Street Extension while a shot or shots were being fired versus Max Holland's "Lost Bullet" having struck a traffic signal mast arm while Zapruder wasn't filming.

Dear Sonderführer Storing,

Max Holland is probably wrong that Oswald's first, missing-everything shot was fired at hypothetical "Z-107" and glanced off the traffic signal's mast arm, but since Elsie Dorman said she temporarily stopped filming right after she heard the first shot, he's still right that said shot was fired before Zapruder resumed filming (after a 17-second pause) at Z-133.

Roselle and Scearce are almost certainly right that, based on the conscious / voluntary reaction times of seven prime witness, Oswald's first shot was at hypothetical "Z-124," i.e., half-a-second before Zapruder resumed filming.

https://d7922adf-f499-4a26-96d4-8ab2d521fa35.usrfiles.com/ugd/d7922a_e280e26982b44f2c97c6e6e27026e385.pdf

-- Tom
« Last Edit: February 25, 2026, 09:20:14 PM by Tom Graves »

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5008
Re: Another sign that interest in the JFK assassination is waning
« Reply #19 on: February 25, 2026, 09:25:31 PM »

  So you automatically attach that possible early shot/Lost Bullet to the sniper's nest? You've "jumped the shark" right outta the box.

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3495
Re: Another sign that interest in the JFK assassination is waning
« Reply #20 on: February 25, 2026, 09:49:07 PM »
So, you automatically attach that possible early missed-shot to the Sniper's Nest?

Dear Sonderführer Storing,

Of course.

Afterall, most of the witnesses heard three shots, the three guys on the fifth floor heard three spent shells hit the floor above them as well as the working of the bolt three times on the short-rifle, Robert Hughes filmed a person in the Sniper's Nest window as the limo was turning onto Elm Street, several people saw a man in said window during the shooting, the trajectory of the entrance wound in the back of JFK's head and the trajectory of the wounds in JFK's lower neck / JBC's back, wrist, and thigh line up with the Sniper's Nest window. etc., etc., etc., and the spray pattern / skull fragments ejection pattern indicate a shot from behind.

Do you have a problem with that?

-- Tom

« Last Edit: February 25, 2026, 09:51:59 PM by Tom Graves »