Wondering about the rear of the head

[Louis Earl]

Just wondering.  An argument continues about the condition of the rear of JFK’s head after the shooting.  Some witnesses said it was blown out, with a large fist sized hole.  These witnesses include Clint Hill, multiple nurses and ER physicians at Parkland Hospital, and the mortician who prepped the body for burial.  Others dispute this, such as the autopsy pathologists.  The autopsy photos show no such wound on the only photo of the rear of the head we have.  Did anyone who saw the rear of JFK’s head after the shooting describe it contemporaneously as “intact”, “whole”, “undamaged”, “normal”, “pristine” or “untouched” or similar words?

[Benjamin Cole]

LE--

Well, you, me and everyone else has wondered the same thing.

There is a guy named Pat Speer who wrote a lot about this.

https://www.patspeer.com/

[Lance Payette]

Many people certainly described the face as appearing untouched. The "pristine" autopsy photos pretty clearly have the flap pulled back into place. If anyone actually described the rear of the head as intact, he needs to have his own head examined.

(Deleted the photo I had previously described as "hauntingly creepy" because it is, in fact, hauntingly creepy. If there is popular outcry to repost it - probably not, huh? - I shall do so.)

[Lance Payette]

LE--

Well, you, me and everyone else has wondered the same thing.

There is a guy named Pat Speer who wrote a lot about this.

https://www.patspeer.com/

Pat Speer's extensive work on the head wounds begins at Chapter 13 and continues through Chapter 15: https://www.patspeer.com/chapter13solvingthegreatheadwoundmyster. Like the Prayer Man site, Pat's site is a goldmine even if one disagrees with him.

[Michael T. Griffith]

Just wondering.  An argument continues about the condition of the rear of JFK’s head after the shooting.  Some witnesses said it was blown out, with a large fist sized hole.  These witnesses include Clint Hill, multiple nurses and ER physicians at Parkland Hospital, and the mortician who prepped the body for burial.  Others dispute this, such as the autopsy pathologists.  The autopsy photos show no such wound on the only photo of the rear of the head we have.  Did anyone who saw the rear of JFK’s head after the shooting describe it contemporaneously as “intact”, “whole”, “undamaged”, “normal”, “pristine” or “untouched” or similar words?

Before anyone knew what they were supposed to say, nobody described the back of the head as undamaged. Nobody. In fact, even the autopsy report says the large wound extended into the occiput, but no such wound is seen in the autopsy photos. The F8 autopsy photo may indeed show a back-of-head wound, if you orient it correctly.

We have scientific evidence that the autopsy skull x-rays have been altered. Multiple OD measurements have found that the 6.5 mm object on the AP x-ray is not metallic. Dr. Mantik was even able to duplicate how the object's image was placed on the x-ray.

We have scientific evidence, along with powerful eyewitness evidence, that the autopsy brain photos are fraudulent and do not show JFK's brain. See

"Undeniable Proof of Fraud: The Impossible JFK Autopsy Brain Photos"
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,4609.0.html

I find it truly mind boggling that anyone could actually, deep down, believe that the Parkland nurses who cleaned the head wound and wrapped the head in a sheet, and the morticians who reassembled the skull after the autopsy, "mistook" a wound above the right ear for a wound 3-4 inches farther back on the head.