Richard Case Nagell

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Richard Case Nagell  (Read 736 times)

Online Benjamin Cole

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 405
Re: Richard Case Nagell
« Reply #8 on: January 16, 2026, 01:26:03 AM »
TG/FL-

An intel agency might make use of troubled individuals as easily manipulated assets, not on-staff officers.

So what, if LHP and Nagell were unstable.

Even causing confusion or dead-ends is a worthy endeavor, from the intel agency perspective.

Bruce Solie has been identified by John Newman as a KGB asset, a point of view Tennent Bagley came to see as plausible, even likely.

Solie is all over Nagell and LHO.

In September, Castro publicly threatened the Kennedy brothers were reverse assassination attempts.

LHO may have been in bad company on 11/22.



JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Richard Case Nagell
« Reply #8 on: January 16, 2026, 01:26:03 AM »


Online Fred Litwin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 533
Re: Richard Case Nagell
« Reply #9 on: January 16, 2026, 02:11:26 AM »
All over Nagell?  What on earth are you talking about.

Nagell couldn't even get a job as a policeman and he couldn't even hold down a job working
for the State of California.

His son does not believe any of this nonsense because they were always so poor and had no money.

Kind of like David Ferrie. Another CIA operative' who also had no money.

Don't the CIA pay salaries?

fred

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3033
Re: Richard Case Nagell
« Reply #10 on: January 16, 2026, 03:00:20 AM »
[Solie was] all over Nagell?  What on earth are you talking about?

Dear Fred,

Where on Earth have you been?

Google: 104-10305-10005.

It's 221 pages long.

-- Tom

« Last Edit: January 16, 2026, 03:14:52 AM by Tom Graves »

Online Fred Litwin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 533
Re: Richard Case Nagell
« Reply #11 on: January 16, 2026, 05:54:32 PM »
Of course I have seen that document and I quote often from it in my last book.

So what?

The HSCA took little interest in Nagell. They had NO interest in having him testify.

Just as the ARRB realized that the Nagell story was ridiculous.

The CIA may have isolated some stuff related to CIA offices, etc., but they had nothing to hide about Nagell.

Have you read my book?

fred

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3033
Re: Richard Case Nagell
« Reply #12 on: January 16, 2026, 07:16:07 PM »
Of course I have seen that document and I quote often from it in my last book.

So what?

The HSCA took little interest in Nagell. They had NO interest in having him testify.

Just as the ARRB realized that the Nagell story was ridiculous.

The CIA may have isolated some stuff related to CIA offices, etc., but they had nothing to hide about Nagell.

Have you read my book?

fred

Dear Fred,

Have you ever considered the possibility that one of the reasons the HSCA "had no interest in having Nagell testify" was because probable KGB mole Bruce Leonard Solie (look him up) had withheld from said committee certain Office of Security files on him?

-- Tom

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Richard Case Nagell
« Reply #12 on: January 16, 2026, 07:16:07 PM »