Were all three shots fired in 5.6 seconds?

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Were all three shots fired in 5.6 seconds?  (Read 6710 times)

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3495
Re: Were all three shots fired in 5.6 seconds?
« Reply #7 on: January 09, 2026, 12:17:31 AM »
Sometimes the JFKA does seem almost as though it had been DESIGNED to be and remain eternally puzzling.

Dear FPR,

It's no mystery that our "innocuous" KGB* has been encouraging the nation-rending bepuzzlement for sixty-six years, now.

*Today's SVR and FSB

-- Tom

Online Benjamin Cole

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 561
Re: Were all three shots fired in 5.6 seconds?
« Reply #8 on: January 09, 2026, 07:01:57 AM »
LP-

Verily.

My take is Gov. JBC struck ~Z-295 and JFK Z-313.

Indicates a second gunsel.

Then, you have the GK smoke-and-bang show.

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3495
Re: Were all three shots fired in 5.6 seconds?
« Reply #9 on: January 09, 2026, 07:27:56 AM »
LP-

Verily.

My take is Gov. JBC struck ~Z-295 and JFK Z-313.

Indicates a second gunsel.

Then, you have the GK smoke-and-bang show.

If you're going to keep repeating that mantra ad infinium, the least you could do is change up the vocabulary a bit from time to time.

Online Benjamin Cole

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 561
Re: Were all three shots fired in 5.6 seconds?
« Reply #10 on: January 09, 2026, 07:59:04 AM »
TG-

Wut is a vokabalary?

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3495
Re: Were all three shots fired in 5.6 seconds?
« Reply #11 on: January 09, 2026, 08:18:00 AM »
TG-

Wut is a vokabalary?

A strong, potato-based form of alcohol after about 30 minutes.

Online Benjamin Cole

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 561
Re: Were all three shots fired in 5.6 seconds?
« Reply #12 on: January 09, 2026, 11:53:42 AM »
Bring back Ripple, or Thunderbird, the real stuff.

Offline Lance Payette

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1101
Re: Were all three shots fired in 5.6 seconds?
« Reply #13 on: January 09, 2026, 12:38:11 PM »
If you're going to keep repeating that mantra ad infinium, the least you could do is change up the vocabulary a bit from time to time.
I looked up "pot calling kettle black" in my authoritative Dictionary of Useful Idioms for Useful Idiots. It gave only one example, but it was apt: "For example, for Thomas Graves to accuse anyone else on earth of using repetitive vocabulary and repeating the same points to the extent of near-maddening tediousness would constititute a paradigmatic example of the idom 'pot calling kettle black.' This example is so extreme that it is unilikely ever to occur in the real world, but it does serve to illustrate the idiom in its most extreme form."