NEW ARTICLE: JFK's Clothing Proves the Single-Bullet Theory Is Impossible

[Michael T. Griffith]

The 25 degree (approximate) downward angle through JBC is easily explained if JBC was struck around z271:

At that time, JBC was leaning backward at an angle of 8.5 degrees to car-vertical. A shot from the SN was moving downward relative to the car at 18 degrees.  So relative to JBC's vertical body line, it would have struck at a downward angle of 26.5 degrees.

One major point that you are failing to address is that any bullet exiting the shirt slits would have torn through the tie knot, but we know there was no hole through the tie, and that no bullet exiting the shirt slits could have nicked to top surface of the tie knot (especially inward from the left edge).

Did you even bother to read the article, which is the subject of this thread?

There is also the fact that there was more blood on the outside of the collar band than on the inside, which supports the accounts that the throat wound was above the collar, and which explains (1) why the FBI found no metallic traces around the shirt slits, but did find such traces around the rear clothing holes, (2) why the FBI lab report on the slits said nothing about the fibers being pushed out, and (3) why the FBI lab initially suggested the shirt slits were made by a fragment, not by a bullet.

Connally was hit by a separate bullet, a separate bullet that arrived at a different angle and that came from a different location. That's why the Zapruder film shows JFK starting to react to his throat wound at least 30 frames before Connally begins to react to his wounds.

Starting in Z226, at least 25 frames after JFK reacts to his throat wound, JFK is struck in the back--his upper body is visibly thrust forward and his hands and elbows are flung upward.

These things are obvious in the Zapruder film to anyone not blinded by the lone-gunman theory.