JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Does Connally's wrist wound disprove the SBT?
Andrew Mason:
--- Quote from: Charles Collins on January 11, 2026, 12:02:00 PM ---I believe that Linda was trying to support her daddy’s claim. If she actually did remember being inline with a sign, I suggest that it was the Thornton sign.
--- End quote ---
That would put the car about a car length before -
--- Quote ---You asked for a frame showing the pointing. Sadly a lot of the enlarged crops of still frames from a movie film do seem like Rorschach blots. Especially if you aren’t looking at the right area of the image. Here is one of those frames I provided earlier with an outline of Linda pointing included:
--- End quote ---
So that white area in her “arm” just happens to match the white area behind her “arm”?
Charles Collins:
--- Quote from: Andrew Mason on January 11, 2026, 08:28:45 PM ---That would put the car about a car length before -
So that white area in her “arm” just happens to match the white area behind her “arm”?
--- End quote ---
That would put the car about a car length before
If that idea is what happened, then: it takes a little time for a thought to form in the brain. The limo was still moving in the meantime.
So that white area in her “arm” just happens to match the white area behind her “arm?
It is called overexposure. Here’s a photo that shows the concept. It’s the full moon rising as photographed through the branches of a dogwood tree. The moon appears to be part of the limb. When actuality the moon is about 240,000 miles behind the limb.
If you watch the moving image (as the movie film is designed to be displayed) you might be able to see that the white area appears to be some white pants moving in the crowd beyond Linda Willis. Typically, the blurry still frames images “magically” become a much clearer moving image when displayed as a movie.
Andrew Mason:
--- Quote from: Charles Collins on January 11, 2026, 10:04:13 PM ---
That would put the car about a car length before
If that idea is what happened, then: it takes a little time for a thought to form in the brain. The limo was still moving in the meantime.
--- End quote ---
Or if she was correct that when the first shot sounded, JFK was passing the sightline between her and the Stemmons sign then it could be that the shot was a bit earlier than z195-z203.
--- Quote --- So that white area in her “arm” just happens to match the white area behind her “arm?
It is called overexposure. Here’s a photo that shows the concept. It’s the full moon rising as photographed through the branches of a dogwood tree. The moon appears to be part of the limb. When actuality the moon is about 240,000 miles behind the limb.
If you watch the moving image (as the movie film is designed to be displayed) you might be able to see that the white area appears to be some white pants moving in the crowd beyond Linda Willis. Typically, the blurry still frames images “magically” become a much clearer moving image when displayed as a movie.
--- End quote ---
Its actually called "diffraction" and it occurs when light passes around a thin edge object. It takes a bright light so that the interference pattern, which is constructive in the centre (i.e. behind the branch), also looks bright. Your white pants lady theory does not provide the amount of light needed to create that effect.
I'll give you a B+ for creativity, though.
Charles Collins:
--- Quote from: Andrew Mason on January 12, 2026, 08:12:21 PM ---Or if she was correct that when the first shot sounded, JFK was passing the sightline between her and the Stemmons sign then it could be that the shot was a bit earlier than z195-z203.
Its actually called "diffraction" and it occurs when light passes around a thin edge object. It takes a bright light so that the interference pattern, which is constructive in the centre (i.e. behind the branch), also looks bright. Your white pants lady theory does not provide the amount of light needed to create that effect.
I'll give you a B+ for creativity, though.
--- End quote ---
Your white pants lady theory does not provide the amount of light needed to create that effect.
Andrew, I have to disagree with you. The moon is reflected sunlight. So is the light being reflected off of the white clothing. Here’s another image cropped from a Zapruder frame a few frames after the one with Linda Willis pointing towards the TSBD. As we can see, there is enough bright light being reflected off of the clothing to cause an apparent starburst effect (lens flare or refraction or whatever you want to call it).
Andrew Mason:
--- Quote from: Charles Collins on January 12, 2026, 10:37:49 PM ---
Your white pants lady theory does not provide the amount of light needed to create that effect.
Andrew, I have to disagree with you. The moon is reflected sunlight. So is the light being reflected off of the white clothing. Here’s another image cropped from a Zapruder frame a few frames after the one with Linda Willis pointing towards the TSBD. As we can see, there is enough bright light being reflected off of the clothing to cause an apparent starburst effect (lens flare or refraction or whatever you want to call it).
--- End quote ---
You appear to be using z174 above for comparison. However, it is much brighter than your Rorschach image, which is around z166. I have brightened z166 so you can make out the faint white background to Linda Willis' right side. z174 is much brighter than z166 so even if your theory was possible, it would not explain why the right arm would not cover that faint white area behind it if the arm actually extended out from the body:
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version