JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Does Connally's wrist wound disprove the SBT?
Tom Graves:
--- Quote from: Benjamin Cole on December 29, 2025, 09:11:46 AM ---TG--
Well, his wife said as much also.
I have read Gov. JBC's WC and HSCA testimonies, and those of Drs. Gregory and Shaw, many times.
At Z-222, JBC is sitting bolt upright. He has been shot through the chest, had his right wrist fractured and the slug penetrated into his thigh?
And that after that, he makes a 180-degree turn in his seat to look for JFK? Unaware of his own grievous injuries?
JBC recalls he was pushed forward by the slug that struck him, and immediately immobilized.
That lines up with ~Z-295.
Also, most ear-witnesses heard a "bang....bang-bang" cadence of shots. That limes up with JFK struck at ~Z-222, and then JBC at ~Z-295 and then JFK again at Z-313.
That's my story, and I am sticking with it.
--- End quote ---
Suit yourself.
Benjamin Cole:
TG-
And my sartorial splendor is peerless.
Andrew Mason:
--- Quote from: Tom Graves on December 28, 2025, 10:36:02 AM ---Bottom Line Answer:
The wrist wound is perfectly consistent with the bullet that exited Connally’s chest.
No awkward hat position is needed.
No second shooter is required.
This is why every modern forensic reconstruction (not just the Warren Commission) reaches the same conclusion.
--- End quote ---
The exit wound on the palm side of the wrist could have been made by a bone shard. There were two large fragment and some small pieces broken from the radius.
The bullet struck the distal side of the radius I.e. near the middle of the forearm. So if the wrist was rotated right, how does the bullet deflect left? Wouldn't it naturally defect right? How does the bullet not deflect away from the point of contact?
Tom Graves:
--- Quote from: Andrew Mason on December 30, 2025, 04:44:04 AM ---The exit wound on the palm side of the wrist could have been made by a bone shard.
--- End quote ---
Yes, and it could have been caused by a miniature UFO, too.
Andrew Mason:
--- Quote from: Tom Graves on December 30, 2025, 05:58:36 AM ---Yes, and it could have been caused by a miniature UFO, too.
--- End quote ---
There was evidence of bone shards: 7-8 bone fragments, maybe more according to Dr. Gregory (4 H 120). No evidence of a UFO, miniature or otherwise.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version