Myths and Errors in ABC's "Truth and Lies" Documentary

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
Sean Kneringer

Author Topic: Myths and Errors in ABC's "Truth and Lies" Documentary  (Read 735 times)

Offline Zeon Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1150
Re: Myths and Errors in ABC's "Truth and Lies" Documentary
« Reply #8 on: Yesterday at 11:37:27 PM »
Mr.Griffith, thanks for staying around on this forum and taking all the flak from LN diehards. For 25  years I have questioned the WC conclusion that Oswald was the only gunman and that he acted alone without any other persons having influenced him.

Although I have concluded that the WC theory is possible I have not seen any conclusive reenactment using an MC rifle in the same condition as the one found on the 6th floor TSBD at 1:20 pm by Boone and Weitzman.

I’ve seen attempts by shooters with newer better quality MC rifles with fully functional and better quality scopes that don’t drift or lose their zero after the 1st shot.

I’ve seen the CBS shooting trial which is a poorly done experiment which essentially “cheats” by allowing the shooters to know in advance exactly how the target will travel along a white rail and the target itself is a composite RED silhouette  figure stuck on a larger black square. The shooters were allowed to be already in position to aim at the target BEFORE it begins to move. There was no tree in the way. There was no requirement to use the stacked boxes as a firing platform. There was no attempt to have the shooter first sitting on a box and then lean over to rest the rifle on the 2 boxes just before beginning to aim and track the moving target.

I’ve seen the 2003 Beyond Conspiracy documentary that Peter Jennings hosted and I’ve found so many errors in that documentary that I’ve concluded it was an intentional fraud.

For me, there are just too many suspicious people interacting with Oswald, such as George Demorhenshield, Jack Ruby. Guy Bannister, and Alpha 66 members who just coincidentally are in a photo with Oswald.

Then as Mr Griffith keeps reminding us, the evidence itself is very suspect and I see no way to reconcile these discrepancies.

Most disturbingly is the  incompetence of Will Fritz ( or was it purposeful obfuscation?) in handling Oswald and failing to  make  a satisfactory recording of interviewing Oswald.

So I remain a Skeptic especially since new evidence seems to keep emerging such as the recording of LBJs advisor talking with Billy Sol Estes.
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 11:39:53 PM by Zeon Mason »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Myths and Errors in ABC's "Truth and Lies" Documentary
« Reply #8 on: Yesterday at 11:37:27 PM »


Online Benjamin Cole

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 368
Re: Myths and Errors in ABC's "Truth and Lies" Documentary
« Reply #9 on: Today at 02:28:27 AM »
Are there photos of Alpha 66 members and LHO together? Are you speaking figuratively?

I think there is a possibility of a couple of guys, possibly Alpha 66'ers, somehow hoodwinking or cooperating with LHO in the JFKA. One was the GK smoke-and-bang show, and the other was a second shooter behind JFK.

But there is no hard evidence of this scenario. It is speculative. 

In general, I suspect a very small JFKA plot (three guys), which is why everything is vapors when it comes to explaining larger plots.

LHO's connections to G2 and KGB'ers have never been heavily researched, except somewhat by Gus Russo.



Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2924
Re: Myths and Errors in ABC's "Truth and Lies" Documentary
« Reply #10 on: Today at 03:07:52 AM »
One was the GK smoke-and-bang show, and the other was a second shooter behind JFK. But there is no hard evidence of this scenario.   

There is no evidence whatsoever.