Why did Oswald go to the movies?

[Howard Gee]

What did Brewer see that was "evading the cops"?

He stood there and "looked scared".

 

Looking scared would be enough.

You really need to stop trying to portray Brewer's actions as irrational and the resulting police response as unwarranted.

Doesn't matter if it was because he thought your hero looked funny, looked scared or just had a receding hairline. 

Bottom line is Brewer thought Saint Patsy was acting suspicously and took the necessary action to get your client apprehended.

Sucks for you and your hero, but you're just going to have to accept it.

[Nicholas Turner]

Who said that?

I believe they kept the film running and only put the lights up just before the police got there. Brewer said they went up to the balcony looked around but couldn't see anything. They had looked downstairs but Brewer said it was dark and that they couldn't see how many people were in there. Then they went upstairs but couldn't see anything.

[Nicholas Turner]

I answered this question. The evidence showing that Brewer was involved in the events of November 22, 1963, does NOT exist in the twenty-six volumes outside of Brewer's claims during his testimony.

If you don't know this then you do NOT know the evidence. See, I *already* answered your question.

Why do you think I am asking you? If knew the evidence I wouldn't ask for it! Mine is a genuine question. The mind set displayed in your responses is very enlightening. I gave it one more go but that's it, you're off my Christmas card list.

[John Iacoletti]

Looking scared would be enough.

Enough for what?

You really need to stop trying to portray Brewer's actions as irrational and the resulting police response as unwarranted.

Why?  The resulting police response was unwarranted.

Doesn't matter if it was because he thought your hero looked funny, looked scared or just had a receding hairline. 

Bottom line is Brewer thought Saint Patsy was acting suspicously and took the necessary action to get your client apprehended.

Sucks for you and your hero, but you're just going to have to accept it.

More useless rhetoric instead of evidence.  How surprising.

[John Iacoletti]

I believe they kept the film running and only put the lights up just before the police got there. Brewer said they went up to the balcony looked around but couldn't see anything. They had looked downstairs but Brewer said it was dark and that they couldn't see how many people were in there. Then they went upstairs but couldn't see anything.

So it's just your conjecture that the reason they couldn't see anything was because it was too dark, but that they still thought he was up there?

[Nicholas Turner]

So it's just your conjecture that the reason they couldn't see anything was because it was too dark, but that they still thought he was up there?

Common sense, conjecture, opinion, call it what you like. Do you think they conducted a thorough search?

[Howard Gee]

Enough for what?

Why?  The resulting police response was unwarranted.

More useless rhetoric instead of evidence.  How surprising.

Enough for what ?  Saint Patsy looking scared would be enough to arouse Brewer's suspicions. That's what.

The police response was warranted. Your client's arrest is proof of that. 

That's not useless rhetoric. That's a fact.