Why did Oswald go to the movies?

[Rob Caprio]

Is there anyone who can assist Caprio here?  He knows that the record indicates that Julia Postal called the DPD.  I posted her affidavit confirming that she did so.  That seems "specific" (who called - Julia Postal) and "uses evidence" (Postal's affidavit confirming she called the police).  And yet Caprio responds over and over with this nonsense.  Can anyone interpret this?  If Caprio has cause to believe that Postal is lying, then why don't we move on to that?  I can't fathom the purpose of his asking this same question over and over without elaboration as to the purpose when it has been answered.  And the answer is a matter of the record that Caprio is already familiar with.

I don't need any assist. The affidavit that you posted is all over the place. We only have her word that she called. I was hoping that you could provide supporting evidence showing which DPD dispatcher took this call. Well?

Then of course you have to explain why she thought a man that she never saw (and Brewer didn't see when she sent him in to the theater to look according to her affidavit) was the killer of JFK when the TT was miles from DP. Well?

[Rob Caprio]

The facts are that the police were roaring up and down the street right in front of the TT.  Postal knew the president had been assassinated a short distance away.  I believe the distance from the TT to Dealey Plaza only is about three miles.  Regardless, she didn't have to know that the man was the "killer of JFK."  What she could see with her own eyes was the that the police were looking for someone on her street.  Brewer tells her about the man.  It doesn't take Nostradamus to conclude that someone entering the theatre without buying a ticket is acting suspiciously - particularly when Brewer is following the guy - and so she reports that to the police having no idea whether this is the guy they are looking for.  Maybe he is and maybe he is not.  All she knows is that the police are looking for someone in her vicinity and it has been brought to her attention that a person in her theatre is behaving suspiciously.  She reports it and the police respond accordingly.  All Oswald has to do is clear this up by explaining himself instead of punching a cop and pulling a gun.  Your hero can't do that, however, because it turns out he is the cop killer and assassin.  There is absolutely nothing here that is unclear or suspicious.  It is a logical sequence of events.

All these words, but NO supporting evidence. No surprise there. Your main problem is -- she NEVER saw the man claimed to be LHO, therefore, she had NO way of knowing how he was acting.

Tell me why she thought a man that she never saw was a suspect in the killing of JFK when DP was miles away. Go ahead.

[Richard Smith]

All these words, but NO supporting evidence. No surprise there. Your main problem is -- she NEVER saw the man claimed to be LHO, therefore, she had NO way of knowing how he was acting.

Tell me why she thought a man that she never saw was a suspect in the killing of JFK when DP was miles away. Go ahead.

I did.  She saw the police roaring up and down the road.  She knew they were looking for someone.  Maybe the JFK assassin, maybe for something else.  DP is all of three miles away!  The important point is that she knew something was going on in her immediate vicinity.  Brewer told her a guy had entered the theatre.  She hadn't sold him a ticket.  She reports him to the police.  What is so perplexing about this?  How about you answer a question for once and tell us why you think she called the police if she had no basis to do so?

[Nicholas Turner]

You have dragged this on for so long instead of simply asking your question again. Why is that? You seem to be the difficult one.

Ok, I'll give it one more go.

You said 'This fabricated story was created to involve Brewer when the actual evidence shows that he was most likely not involved.'

I asked 'What actual evidence is that?'

Perhaps you could clarify by saying what the fabricated story is, what the true story is, and what the evidence is relating to Brewer's involvement.

[John Iacoletti]

Her we go again. For the umpteenth time. Where did I ever say that any one of, say Bug53, were evidence of murder in and of their own?

I wasn't referring to you.  What makes you think it's all about you?  You never talk about the evidence at all...

[John Iacoletti]

You continue to ignore the context

Just as I thought.  Grandstanding.

[John Iacoletti]

Brewer sees someone enter his storefront as the cops are passing by and gets the feeling this person is trying to evade them.

The person who is trying to evade the cops becomes a suspect in the murder of JDT.

What did Brewer see that was "evading the cops"?

He stood there and "looked scared".