Did Knott Laboratory Disprove the Single-Bullet Theory?

[Fred Litwin]

https://www.onthetrailofdelusion.com/post/did-knott-laboratory-disprove-the-single-bullet-theory

Did Knott Laboratory Disprove the Single-Bullet Theory?

I believe that their recreation of the single-bullet theory substantiates Dale Myers' animation, and thus proves that one bullet went through Kennedy and Connally.

[Benjamin Cole]

FL--

Are you a fan of the "the bullet tumbled after passing through JFK's neck and then hit Gov. Connally, leaving a large sideways-ish entry wound, thus proving the bullet struck JFK first" explanation?

Both Michael Baden and Robert Blakey subscribe to the tumbling bullet theory. This theory was cited for along time, but seems to have faded in recent decades.

[Tom Graves]

FL--

Are you a fan of the "the bullet tumbled after passing through JFK's neck and then hit Gov. Connally, leaving a large sideways-ish entry wound, thus proving the bullet struck JFK first" explanation?

Both Michael Baden and Robert Blakey subscribe to the tumbling bullet theory. This theory was cited for along time, but seems to have faded in recent decades.

What does it matter whether or not CE-399 started tumbling between JFK's neck and JBC's back (where it caused an entrance wound measuring 15 mm x 6 mm)?

[Benjamin Cole]

What does it matter?

Both Michael Baden and Robert Blakey, both HSBC, said the fact that the "bullet tumbled" before hitting Gov. JBC was proof the slug had first passed through JFK's neck.

So, did the bullet tumble before striking JBC?

What say you?

[Tom Graves]

What does it matter?

Both Michael Baden and Robert Blakey, both HSBC, said the fact that the "bullet tumbled" before hitting Gov. JBC was proof the slug had first passed through JFK's neck.

So, did the bullet tumble before striking JBC?

What say you?

Maybe.

Maybe not.

Why does it matter?

What does HSBC stand for?

[Benjamin Cole]

HSBC is a major global bank. HSCA is the relevant congressional committee, and I stand corrected.

Well, if two major figures in the JFKA investigation-world say the tumbling bullet theory is why they believe in the SBT...what happens if we have proof the bullet did not tumble before it struck Gov. JBC?

[Tom Graves]

HSBC is a major global bank. HSCA is the relevant congressional committee, and I stand corrected.

Well, if two major figures in the JFKA investigation-world say the tumbling bullet theory is why they believe in the SBT...what happens if we have proof the bullet did not tumble before it struck Gov. JBC?

The Haags showed in "Cold Case: JFK" that that kind of bullet has a tendency to start tumbling upon exiting something soft like a block of ballistics gel or a human neck.

However, if CE-399 *didn't* tumble between JFK's throat and JBC's back, the possibility remains that the reason the wound in JBC's back (15mm x 6mm) was more elongated than the one in JFK's lower neck / upper back was simply because he was (still) turned far to his right at Z-222 and therefore CE-399 struck him at a sharper angle than it did JFK.

It seems to me that you're trying really, really hard to incorporate a second shooter in the scenario . . .  maybe even a Castro-loyal Cuban.

Am I right?

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-UdKSnTDThh4/Uw3zRDBeDfI/AAAAAAAAx-c/pzqLNRvmd3k/s1600/Zapruder-Film-In-Motion-Clip.gif

[Benjamin Cole]

Oooooh, I am straining, struggling, laboring, sweating bullets, drudging and slogging to invent, fabricate and imagine two shooters behind JFK on 11/22.

I can't figure out how Gov. JBC was struck ~Z-295 and JFK at Z-313.

Last night I flatulated so hard I gained two inches of lift off the ceramic throne! Stress!

In fact, there is a small round hole in the back of JBC's assassination-day shirt.

https://www.tsl.texas.gov/sites/default/files/public/tslac/landing/documents/jfk-damaged-clothing18.pdf

Why Blakey and Baden, and a generation of LN'ers, jibber-jabbered about a "tumbling bullet" is somewhat comical. Basic physical evidence does not count?

Dr Robert Shaw leaned to the explanation that JBC was shot directly from above and behind. And wondered about the shot to JBC's wrist.

I agree with Shaw.

Castro, G2, KGB and Alpha-66 come to mind. Possibly CIA'ers who were really KGB assets.

Plenty of Cubans wanted revenge on JFK.

The LN explanation was preferred at the time (1963-4). Especially by KGB moles in the CIA?