Dear danny BOY o'meara,
That's a suggestion I refuse to accept.
The evidence I care about regarding the actual shooting is the photographic evidence (film, photographs, x-rays), the ballistics evidence, the fingerprint evidence, the medical evidence, and the autopsy report evidence, not the unreliable memories of startled-and-traumatized witnesses that you cherish so rabidly.
-- Tom
That's a suggestion I refuse to accept.It's not a suggestion.
It's the impartial observation of a fact.
In every interaction I have had with you, you have refused to accept a single scrap of evidence that contradicts your spoon-fed beliefs. Preferring Denial or just making some nonsense up off the top of your head.
That you think you can just write off all eye-witness testimony shows how deeply delusional you have become regarding this case. There may have been a time when you looked at the evidence with open eyes but that time is long gone.
Debating anything with you is like debating with a parrot that has learned a few key phrases.
This thread is an excellent example of exactly what I'm talking about.
Rosemary Willis responding to a first shot at 'z124' has been debunked in a dozen different ways. It's clear for all to see that you are simply projecting your deluded beliefs onto her completely innocent actions.
And you dare not engage in a genuine debate, as the depth of your delusions will be revealed for everyone to see.
More frighteningly, you might even glimpse those depths for yourself.