Were JFK and JBC both hit by CE-399 at Z-199?

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Were JFK and JBC both hit by CE-399 at Z-199?  (Read 576 times)

Online Zeon Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1148
Re: Were JFK and JBC both hit by CE-399 at Z-199?
« Reply #8 on: November 21, 2025, 12:55:31 PM »
I’ve corrected some misspelled words in my previous post. Sorry about that Tom lol.

The most critical point I intended to make , was that it is not physically possible that there was a 1.5 sec delay between the sound of a shot being heard at Z190  and JFKs body moving because the velocity of the 6.5 mm bullet was 2000 ft/sec and the distance traveled was only approx 65 feet. Therefore  a bullet fired at Z190 that hit JFK would impact JFKs body virtually simultaneous with the sound from the muzzle blast being heard by ear witnesses.

The idea of a “ delayed reaction” by JFK to the impact of a bullet traveling at 2000 ft/sec velocity is therefore highly improbable as the impact force of the 6.5 mm bullet would be  immediately transferred to JFKs  body and would cause his body to move forward just as it does at Z223-Z225.

« Last Edit: November 21, 2025, 02:03:37 PM by Zeon Mason »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Were JFK and JBC both hit by CE-399 at Z-199?
« Reply #8 on: November 21, 2025, 12:55:31 PM »


Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2895
Re: Were JFK and JBC both hit by CE-399 at Z-199?
« Reply #9 on: November 21, 2025, 11:47:27 PM »
It is not physically possible that there was a 1.5 sec delay between the sound of a shot being heard at Z-190 and JFK's body moving because the velocity of the 6.5 mm bullet was 2000 ft/sec and the distance traveled was only approximately 65 feet. Therefore, a bullet fired at Z190 that hit JFK would impact JFKs body virtually simultaneous with the sound from the muzzle blast being heard by ear witnesses.

I have no idea what you're talking about.

Who said anything about a shot at Z-190?

Online Andrew Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1646
    • SPMLaw
Re: Were JFK and JBC both hit by CE-399 at Z-199?
« Reply #10 on: November 26, 2025, 09:48:38 PM »
Sigh. . . .

Again, for the umpteenth time:

-- We have known for at least 20 years that the back wound was shallow and had no exit point, which is why the first two drafts of the autopsy report said nothing about the throat wound being an exit point for the back wound.

-- Abundant photographic evidence proves that no bullet exited JFK's shirt slits, and that the tie knot could not have been nicked by any bullet exiting the shirt slits.

-- Connally himself, the guy who actually experienced the wounding, said he was certain he was not hit before Z229.

-- The JFK clothing holes prove the back wound was several inches below the throat wound.

-- The hit on JFK occurred at Z186-190, but even a hit at Z199 would not have suddenly visibly jolted him forward at Z226-232. The Z226-232 reaction is clearly an immediate response to the impact of a bullet.

-- Connally's back wound proves the bullet that made the wound was not severely yawing or traveling sideways, and the narrow wound tract through Connally's chest proves the same thing about the bullet's behavior as it passed through the chest. 

-- Repeated wound ballistics tests have invalidated the SBT and proved that no bullet could have done the alleged damage and emerged in CE 399's nearly pristine condition.

I have personally documented these facts many times in this forum, but you guys keep ignoring them and pretending that the SBT is valid. This is why we never get anywhere in this forum, because we have a bunch of people like you who continue to cling to absurd myths such as the SBT in spite of the many facts that refute them.
JBC said he never felt his thigh wound.  The thigh wound did not interfere with any bodily function.  The fact is that bullet wounds are often not felt:
Click to play:

So we can't say that JBC had not been hit in the thigh by z229 simply because he said he had not been hit.  He did feel the impact of the bullet that hit his back. So his evidence that he was not hit in the back before z229 could be somewhat probative.
« Last Edit: November 26, 2025, 09:52:35 PM by Andrew Mason »