What's your favorite reason for believing Oswald didn't do it?

[Dan O'meara]

This is new. Dan the Victim.

You need to calm down, Jack.
Let's deal with your wild, unsubstantiated claims first -

This is surprising. Tripe and nonsense are the basis and backbone of your standard post.
 
1] Quote what nonsense I have "made up" about Williams and his lunch.
By that I mean quote the actual words I have posted, not your raving opinion.
 
2] Quote what "fabricated tripe" I have posted.
Again, quote my actual words, not your unhinged ravings.

Dan---"The lunch remains photographed by Studebaker by the two-wheeler, at the end of the third aisle, in front of the third set of windows from Houston Street, were initially discovered by Luke Mooney ON TOP of the Sniper's Nest. Luke Mooney was the  officer who discovered the SN, the first person on that scene after the shooting.
This means two things:
1] When Bonnie Ray finished his lunch he left the remains of the lunch on top of the Sniper's Nest. Why would he do that?
2] These lunch remains were removed from the Sniper's Nest and placed by the two-wheeler truck shortly after their discovery. Who did that and why?"

What kind of a mind could even think this crap up? They knew they had to move because --Why? What a bunch of garbage.
 
 
Shelley told the WC he 'thought' that at one time he might have said to someone that Givens was eating fried chicken, but he wasn't sure. He even had to ask Givens, he was so unsure.
But Givens is clear - he left his lunch in the domino room when he arrived at work and ate his sandwich outside the building at lunch time.
That's a fact.

Huh, what? Typical Dan one dimensional thinking. Completely missed the point or deliberately trying to change the subject.

I've dealt with you before, Jack.

Really? No, you were tolerated like a simple minded child. Had to babysit you through the whole discussion.

 
You usually last at least a couple of posts before you start ranting.
So, take a breath and decide whether you want to discuss this rationally or whether you are just going full rant mode from the start.

Dan the Victim again. After babysitting you through the Styles and Adams nonsense, pretty low on tolerance.
 
Check Givens' testimony. He states he had his sandwich outside the building.
Do you agree that a partially eaten piece of chicken was found on top of the Sniper's Nest?
Now...here's the big one - Do you agree that a small lunch sack was also found on top of the Sniper's Nest?

He was stating they were always snacking. You can’t put that together? No wonder this whole thing goes right past you.
 
Let's have a rational discussion, Jack. Like two adults.   

The discussion is over. Two detectives explained their role in watching over the lunch remains. Did you miss that? Once again, I think you have been embarrassed by not knowing the whole story and posting your one dimensional thinking. The rest of this is covering up that fact.

 
Classic Nessan foaming-at -the-mouth lunacy.
For anyone who wants a laugh have a look at the "3 Minute Lie" thread where you will find Jack in full rant mode.
When handling someone like Jack, the trick is to keep presenting the facts and simply wait for the meltdown.

Finding Bonnie Ray's lunch remains ON TOP of the Sniper's Nest is a truly massive headache for Lone Nuttters. There have been numerous attempts trying to explain this inconvenient fact away (we've already seen Tom's piss-weak attempt) and now we have Jack insisting there was two sets of lunch remains - one on the Sniper's Nest and one a couple of aisles over by the two-wheeler truck.
The main part of Jack's argument is Shelley's WC testimony. In it Shelley says he thought that maybe he might have told someone at some time that he thought he might have seen Charles Givens eating chicken on the 6th floor  on the day of the assassination. He says that he even asked Givens what he was eating.
However, Givens is adamant that he ate his lunch - a sandwich - outside the building:

Mr. BELIN. I want to backtrack a minute before we come to the shots. When did you eat lunch?
Mr. GIVENS. When did I eat lunch? I ate lunch after. Let’s see, no; I ate lunch before I went up there, because I stood outside and ate my sandwich standing out there.
Mr. BELIN. You ate your lunch outside?
Mr. GIVENS. Yes, sir. Standing in front of the building.
Mr. BELIN. In front of what building?
Mr. GIVENS. Texas School Book.
Mr. BELIN. Did you ever eat any lunch inside the building?
Mr. GIVENS. Yes, sir ; I eat inside the building all the time.
Mr. BELIN. On November 22, did you eat inside the building?
Mr. GIVENS. No, sir.

What do you say to that, Jack?
And here's the two questions you avoided from my last post. So, for the second time:

Do you agree that a partially eaten piece of chicken was found on top of the Sniper's Nest?
Now...here's the big one - Do you agree that a small lunch sack was also found on top of the Sniper's Nest?


Let the meltdown commence