JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
A Car, A Garden, And A Coupla Guys
John Corbett:
--- Quote from: Royell Storing on October 16, 2025, 06:50:07 AM --- For starters, it is ILLEGAL to park alongside the Island.
--- End quote ---
Yes it is. We should have the death penalty for that offense.
--- Quote ---
The Hughes Film shows a car parked in the same position alongside the Island about 15-20 minutes after the Kill Shot. Above that car is a sign attached to the Traffic Light Pole that reads, "No Parking at any time".
--- End quote ---
The bastards were illegally parked for 20 minutes. Hanging is too good for them.
--- Quote ---
Just look at the feet of the people standing on the Island. You can see the Street behind them. If there was a car directly behind them, you would Not be able to see the street. A car parked behind them would block the view of the street. What you are seeing is a car on the other side of the street. It is pointed toward the railroad yard. You are seeing the (L) rear fender/tail light/trunk of a car on the other side of the street, close to the Huge Gates.
--- End quote ---
Proof positive it was a getaway car. <chuckle>
Royell Storing:
--- Quote from: James Hackerott on October 18, 2025, 12:01:05 AM ---Yes Tom, the car seems close to the Elm Exension's south curb, which is the "island" north curb. I'm attaching a single graphic showing the two positions along with the Wiegman frame for comparison. Which 3D render looks more like the Wiegman frame to you?
--- End quote ---
This is the Brightest still frame I have seen. Just look at the ladies standing on the far (R). They are standing in the street. Behind them is the Street. Not the Island. The surface of the Street behind these ladies on the far (R), is the same as what we see Behind Fedora Man. Behind Fedora Man we are seeing ALL the way back to the car parked near the "wide open" Huge Gates. And why is that? Because the "getaway" car is Not There. NOT YET!
John Corbett:
To this day, Royell has ever never offered a single piece of evidence the car in question was a getaway car, or that the DPD showed any interest in the car. He simply assumes what he cannot prove and his reasons for believing that car was a getaway car are truly laughable.
Royell Storing:
--- Quote from: John Corbett on June 08, 2026, 02:06:39 PM ---To this day, Royell has ever never offered a single piece of evidence the car in question was a getaway car, or that the DPD showed any interest in the car. He simply assumes what he cannot prove and his reasons for believing that car was a getaway car are truly laughable.
--- End quote ---
You're the guy claiming that the DPD "impounded" the car. If the DPD "impounded" the car as YOU CLAIMED, I believe this would show that the DPD was interested in this car. How many times are you gonna flip-flop on YOUR "impounded" car issue?
John Corbett:
--- Quote from: Royell Storing on June 08, 2026, 02:41:13 PM --- You're the guy claiming that the DPD "impounded" the car. If the DPD "impounded" the car as YOU CLAIMED, I believe this would show that the DPD was interested in this car. How many times are you gonna flip-flop on YOUR "impounded" car issue?
--- End quote ---
I never claimed the DPD impounded the car. As I recall, I posed it to you as a question. If the DPD thought that car was involved in any way with the assassination, why wouldn't they have impounded it. You never offered any evidence that they did or even showed and interest in the car. Your reasoning for believing that was a getaway car is truly hairbrained.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version