What Would a Valid Lone-Gunman Rifle Test Look Like?

[Tommy Shanks]

This thread is a perfect example of what happens when you try to engage lone-gunman theorists in substantive discussion about the essence of their case, i.e., the fact that the alleged shooting feat was far beyond the ability of their supposed lone gunman, Lee Harvey Oswald, and would have been extremely difficult, and arguably impossible, even for a highly skilled rifleman.

Who CARES how "difficult" it may or may not have been? That is a pointless statement. EVERY piece of physical evidence in this case proves the shots were fired by a single weapon from above and behind the motorcade, no matter how "difficult" they were.

[Jack Nessan]

This thread is a perfect example of what happens when you try to engage lone-gunman theorists in substantive discussion about the essence of their case, i.e., the fact that the alleged shooting feat was far beyond the ability of their supposed lone gunman, Lee Harvey Oswald, and would have been extremely difficult, and arguably impossible, even for a highly skilled rifleman.

“the essence of their case”

The essence of the case is there were only two shots you have never proven there was third. Shooting feat? Pure fantasy. Focusing on something that never happened.

The whole expert rifle tripe is nothing but nonsense. Plays no role in understanding the shooting sequence.