How Did Bart Kamp Create The Lovelady Image?

[Royell Storing]

The plaid bars and Lovelady's visible bald spot are not doctored...Neither is Shelley's Duck's Bahookie hair doo, black jacket, and white shirt collar...This is why the corruption on The Education Forum is so wickedly evil...Because it poisons and harms the phony academic standard that website pretends to uphold...Mark Knight is like a dirty small town sheriff who always does the job he's expected to do with his rulings and avoids recognizing the dishonest corruption of the people he's ruling in favor of...The membership pretends to avoid it as well...Simkin then puts on that phony Oxford/Cambridge above it all intellectual act and skates past the issue that he is fully responsible for as if he doesn't notice...The current Couch/Darnell film is good enough for any credible researcher to realize the pair fast-walking up the extension are already long proven to be Shelley and Lovelady and that anyone doubting it is basically trolling and marring good progress of research...The Education Forum refuses to answer for the correct evidence on Prayer Man that proves Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton...This one thing alone discredits all the self-platitudes they assign themselves as far as credibility...

The Education Forum gets away with the murder of switching the issue from the rotten dishonesty of Sandy Larsen and his deletion of evidence that disproved himself to a witch-hunt against the researcher who single-handedly out-argued the board on its favorite pet theory...The dishonest scoundrel who pushed that theory (Bart Kamp) is now safely a member while he still hasn't admitted the obvious evidence that refuted him...Mark Knight has been allowed to disappear the entire issue by means of bullying and vindictive moderation disguised as high-minded academic moderation and ban the person with the correct evidence for life on trumped-up BS designed to protect the wrong-doers...Knight is not made to answer for how his wrongful moderation has prevented exposure of the most important evidence discovery of our generation nor is that very important discovery ever shown on the forum...Jim DiEugenio is shilled and pampered by a membership that honors his taking a theory that he already admitted to me was false and bringing it to Congress...This dubious process endangers the credibility of JFK Assassination research - but that doesn't bother Jim D because he is an entity that always manages to get bailed out by his own wordsmithing and the corrupt sycophants who always endorse it...This is all capped-off by the ultimate insult to injury of Andrew Iler having total power and pretending he has addressed all this with a dignified set of rules, when all he is is just another Jim DiEugenio butt-******...There has to be someone on The Education Forum who remembers Larsen's photo analysis of Lovelady's plaid bars...The main thrust of that forum is not good research...It is organized dishonesty and may they be damned for it...

    You have just been confronted with being a Liar. And what do you do? YOU refuse to take the stand.  "GUILTY" as charged.

[Brian Doyle]

I totally agree with you, Albert.  And furthermore, that reopenkennedycase place never did you no favours, either.  And furtherevenMORE, that deep politics forum
writing about ‘The Albert Doyle Operation’ (it’s right on top of the search engine! even above ‘Sherlock Holmes’ aka Conan Doyle-lol) really sunk pretty low, with Drago, Burnham & Co. leading the charge. I mean, the nerve of some people.

ROKC still exists under the new "Jacks" website...Tony Chrome runs it..."Jacks" is on a private setting and does not reach the public...The reason the ex-Greg Parker gang hides on Jacks is because they know their content is rubbish and they don't want to answer for it by showing it to the public...I was allowed to post there for several years...I was banned a few months ago when Kamp posted a demand that I be removed and Chrome dutifully obeyed it as Kamp's docile servant...Kamp barks orders and Chrome goes on his knees and does Kamp's bidding...The reason Kamp demanded my banning is because they thought the Luna Committee was close to obtaining the original films and they didn't want me present on the board to take credit...Greg Parker retired his ROKC website because he's fully aware he's a crazy evidence hacker and troll...He was never serious and therefore he quit...Banning is how those cowards operate...Kamp has no problem with his membership on The Education Forum...

Peter Lemkin sent me a Private Message saying no more posting about The Education Forum or I would be banned...This is the same Lemkin who erased The Deep Politics Forum rules that protected members...Those rules were written precisely to keep Lemkin and the DPF moderators from abusing members with their moderator power...Lemkin oversaw their removal and there are no more member- protecting rules...So Lemkin is no different than Donald Trump...Lemkin never apologized to me or admitted I was right on Prayer Man...I think Magda is the only reason I am allowed to post there but she has an annoying habit of not being present in matters like the above...Lemkin now moderates because he has a moderator avatar and what he says goes simply because he says so...I think they are delusional that they haven't destroyed the Deep Politics Forum because of that and even DiEugenio prefers The Education Forum and doesn't post there...It used to be a moderation issue if you posted over on the EF but now Lemkin has knuckled under and conceded to the EF and fraternizers who prefer to post there instead of the DPF...Lemkin prefers to bash a scapegoat while not answering to any rules instead...Or answering to the actual issues upon which that persecution was based...These people would rather destroy an entire website than admit they were wrong on Prayer Man...The Deep Politics Website was formed in opposition to The Education Forum...Lemkin has now reversed that with no accountability while attacking the guy who did what DPF was designed to do from its inception...

   

[Mark A. Oblazney]

Ya know what I think ?  Well I’m gonna tell you anyhow.  I think there ought to be some kind of award for the best living conspiracy buff/kook/theorist that’s still alive. The Dead List is too long.  So what would be the criteria in order to be “nominated”?

Let’s call it The Tony Marsh Award, since we don’t know if he’s dead or not.  Which hero should we nominate ?  Should I start ?  No, you first, hero !  maybe a poll ?

[Dan O'meara]

Below are two cropped images designed to emphasise that the Sprague image, from which Kemp got his incredibly detailed Lovelady image, has been tampered with.
The top image is a crop from the Sprague image (note the light square around the two figures on the Elm Street extension. This alone should have alarm bells ringing).
The bottom image is a crop of a screen grab from "4 Days in November".
It is beyond question that the 4 Days image is far superior in quality and the amount of information it contains than the Sprague image. Look at the lattice pattern on the TSBD building wall. It is not visible in the Sprague image. There is a car parked next to the building which is barely visible it's so washed out in the Sprague image but is clearly visible in the 4 Days image.
Yet it is from the washed out Sprague image that the super-fine detail of 'Lovelady's' shirt emerges when none of this detail is present in the far superior 4 Days image.
This is proof the Sprague image has been faked.

[Brian Doyle]

The Sprague enhancement is better for bringing out Lovelady's plaid pattern and Shelley's white shirt collar...(And Lovelady's bald spot)...None of these have been doctored and they will appear exactly the same on the original film...

I'm sure this issue would be more solved than it already has been if the original celluloid were gotten and scanned...

The Prayer Man people are cheaters because they hold back and don't participate in further examining the evidence...Instead they ban and censor in order to protect their dirty clique...The Education Forum is all a group of sycophants and friends so when they cheat and with-hold evidence they get encouraged and rewarded on the forum...Being internet hacks, they make it a personal school yard contest that they take a little too much pleasure in but that doesn't stop them from selling themselves as serious researchers...Somehow Larsen managed to enhance Lovelady's plaid bars better than Kamp did and their irregular pattern matched perfectly beyond a doubt ending the issue...When I managed to get a message past the censorship filters the clique sets up for people who disprove them and told Larsen he had just proven the time Frazier was staring in shock at Sarah Stanton instead of admitting this evidence he went back and deleted his photo analysis of the plaid bars...

The two men are obviously Shelley & Lovelady...

[Royell Storing]

Below are two cropped images designed to emphasise that the Sprague image, from which Kemp got his incredibly detailed Lovelady image, has been tampered with.
The top image is a crop from the Sprague image (note the light square around the two figures on the Elm Street extension. This alone should have alarm bells ringing).
The bottom image is a crop of a screen grab from "4 Days in November".
It is beyond question that the 4 Days image is far superior in quality and the amount of information it contains than the Sprague image. Look at the lattice pattern on the TSBD building wall. It is not visible in the Sprague image. There is a car parked next to the building which is barely visible it's so washed out in the Sprague image but is clearly visible in the 4 Days image.
Yet it is from the washed out Sprague image that the super-fine detail of 'Lovelady's' shirt emerges when none of this detail is present in the far superior 4 Days image.
This is proof the Sprague image has been faked.

     Have you examined the Gerda Dunckel Gifs over on You Tube? I prefer the "Gerda Dunckel Gif 2".
      I believe her Gifs show both figures are Not Lovelady and Shelley. The images provide better defined views of both guys hairlines and (L) ears. These gifs do not directly address the Lovelady shirt issue, but if that is Not Lovelady, that is Not his plaid shirt.

[Dan O'meara]

The Sprague enhancement is better for bringing out Lovelady's plaid pattern and Shelley's white shirt collar...(And Lovelady's bald spot)...None of these have been doctored and they will appear exactly the same on the original film...

I'm sure this issue would be more solved than it already has been if the original celluloid were gotten and scanned...

The Prayer Man people are cheaters because they hold back and don't participate in further examining the evidence...Instead they ban and censor in order to protect their dirty clique...The Education Forum is all a group of sycophants and friends so when they cheat and with-hold evidence they get encouraged and rewarded on the forum...Being internet hacks, they make it a personal school yard contest that they take a little too much pleasure in but that doesn't stop them from selling themselves as serious researchers...Somehow Larsen managed to enhance Lovelady's plaid bars better than Kamp did and their irregular pattern matched perfectly beyond a doubt ending the issue...When I managed to get a message past the censorship filters the clique sets up for people who disprove them and told Larsen he had just proven the time Frazier was staring in shock at Sarah Stanton instead of admitting this evidence he went back and deleted his photo analysis of the plaid bars...

The two men are obviously Shelley & Lovelady...

The Sprague enhancement is better for bringing out Lovelady's plaid pattern and Shelley's white shirt collar

How is it better?
How is the more washed out image, that has far less detail, better for bringing out fine detail?
How is that better than the far clearer image that has far more detail in it?
What you're saying makes zero sense.
There is hardly any fine detail in the Sprague image except inside the suspicious lighter square that contains the two men.

Why is it none of this fine detail present in the superior 4 Days image or any other version I can find?
No fine detail on the shirt.
No bald spot.

This is clear proof the Sprague image has been doctored.