How Did Bart Kamp Create The Lovelady Image?

[Royell Storing]

Anyone who makes up things that aren't true and insists they are true is a fantasist.
That's you Royell.
It's got nothing to do with agreeing or not agreeing with me.
You don't agree with reality. That's the problem.
Your constant insistence that Weigman can be seen running across the knoll in the Bell film is utterly bizarre. It's delusional. It has nothing to do with agreeing with me.
This forum is littered with the nonsense you have made up out of thin air and that you insist must be treated seriously.

Making up fantasies has got nothing to do with agreeing with me.
So you can stop crying about that, grow up and join the real world.

PS: I had a funny feeling Brian wasn't going to able to back up his claim about Sandy Larsen and it appears to be the case. But I stated that I would be willing to concede the point if he did so and that is still the case. That's called being reasonable, Royell. Give it a try some time.

                                                                  SEARCH "YOU TUBE"

    I've helped you with sourcing numerous times. Going way back to the better def Lovelady images. You wouldn't even be aware of "The JFK Theorist" if it weren't for me.  And now I am encouraging You to familiarize yourself with a Hi Def copy of the Couch Film. The Couch Film shows Wiegman running down the Knoll. The Couch Film shows Wiegman (W) of where we see him on the Bell Film. And this is only seconds later. You gotta have a broad based knowledge of the image evidence in order to connect the dots. Same goes for your currently attempting to time stamp the Darnell film footage. Like I said, you are very good with the main players in front of the TSBD. You get outside of that and you are hurting. I also believe, to date, the assassination film copies you have eyeballed are Old and definition challenged. This is why you and others for decades believed Wiegman was laying across the steps. The clearer Bell Film images show Wiegman is NOT on the steps, and he is Not facing Mrs Hester above him. Wiegman is on the grass. Just look below the Bench on the (R). This will show you where the steps End and the ground begins.   

[Brian Doyle]

PS: I had a funny feeling Brian wasn't going to able to back up his claim about Sandy Larsen and it appears to be the case.

That is why such corruption is so wrong...It punishes the victim and establishes a dishonest norm...

There has to be someone on The Education Forum who remembers Larsen's photo analysis of the plaid bars...

[Dan O'meara]

That is why such corruption is so wrong...It punishes the victim and establishes a dishonest norm...

There has to be someone on The Education Forum who remembers Larsen's photo analysis of the plaid bars...

Was Larsen's analysis of the same doctored image you base your own identification on?

[Brian Doyle]

The image isn't doctored...This will be proven by obtaining the original Darnell film and showing the exact same plaid pattern on the original film...People who claim alteration where there was no alteration (Sandy Larsen) condemn themselves to Cinque land...

Larsen's image was better than Kamp's and I assume Larsen somehow got the original or accessed technology that was better able to resolve the current copy...The image Larsen used for his analysis zoomed closer in to the plaid and managed to capture the exact alternating red, black, white, and brown plaid bars and their uniqueness and then perfectly match them to the bars seen on Lovelady's plaid in other photos...The match was perfect and was proof beyond a doubt...Proof that shows you and Royell are full of it...When I told Larsen that he had therefore indirectly proven the time that Frazier said he was standing and staring in shock at Sarah Stanton by locating Lovelady & Shelley fast-walking up the extension Larsen went back and deleted his Education Forum thread containing the photo analysis of Lovelady's plaid bars...There is nothing too low for the clique on The Education Forum and they always get to rule on themselves and their own rank dishonesty...Iler is now enforcing that corruption and has the nerve to do it under a so-called strict set of rules...Jim DiEugenio is the Trump-like leader of that clique who managed to parlay that sordid corruption all the way to the point of presenting a knowingly-false Prayer Man theory before Congress...

Just to show how dishonest The Education Forum is the clique doesn't speak up and admit Larsen's original photo analysis or his dishonest deletion of it...And those people are judging ME!...You'll never see the rank hypocrite Mark Knight comment on this business or its significance in regard to The Education Forum's so-called purpose and rules...Knight is too busy banning for life the researcher who discovered the conspiracy evidence discovery of our generation on false rules violation charges...And the clique doesn't mind...

[Mark A. Oblazney]

I totally agree with you, Albert.  And furthermore, that reopenkennedycase place never did you no favours, either.  And furtherevenMORE, that deep politics forum
writing about ‘The Albert Doyle Operation’ (it’s right on top of the search engine! even above ‘Sherlock Holmes’ aka Conan Doyle-lol) really sunk pretty low, with Drago, Burnham & Co. leading the charge. I mean, the nerve of some people.

[Dan O'meara]

The image isn't doctored...This will be proven by obtaining the original Darnell film and showing the exact same plaid pattern on the original film...People who claim alteration where there was no alteration (Sandy Larsen) condemn themselves to Cinque land...

Larsen's image was better than Kamp's and I assume Larsen somehow got the original or accessed technology that was better able to resolve the current copy...The image Larsen used for his analysis zoomed closer in to the plaid and managed to capture the exact alternating red, black, white, and brown plaid bars and their uniqueness and then perfectly match them to the bars seen on Lovelady's plaid in other photos...The match was perfect and was proof beyond a doubt...Proof that shows you and Royell are full of it...When I told Larsen that he had therefore indirectly proven the time that Frazier said he was standing and staring in shock at Sarah Stanton by locating Lovelady & Shelley fast-walking up the extension Larsen went back and deleted his Education Forum thread containing the photo analysis of Lovelady's plaid bars...There is nothing too low for the clique on The Education Forum and they always get to rule on themselves and their own rank dishonesty...Iler is now enforcing that corruption and has the nerve to do it under a so-called strict set of rules...Jim DiEugenio is the Trump-like leader of that clique who managed to parlay that sordid corruption all the way to the point of presenting a knowingly-false Prayer Man theory before Congress...

Just to show how dishonest The Education Forum is the clique doesn't speak up and admit Larsen's original photo analysis or his dishonest deletion of it...And those people are judging ME!...You'll never see the rank hypocrite Mark Knight comment on this business or its significance in regard to The Education Forum's so-called purpose and rules...Knight is too busy banning for life the researcher who discovered the conspiracy evidence discovery of our generation on false rules violation charges...And the clique doesn't mind...

You are the one who is full of it.
Do you really think you can claim evidence you can't provide and probably doesn't exist?
What if everything you are saying is a lie? How do we know it isn't?
You've already lost all credibility regarding this topic and this claim about Larsen seems desperate and far-fetched.

And just to clarify, the image IS doctored. That's not in dispute. You have based your identification on this single, doctored image. That's not in dispute either.
What is in dispute is your dubious claim about Larsen's work.
Please provide evidence. Your word counts for nothing.

[Brian Doyle]

The plaid bars and Lovelady's visible bald spot are not doctored...Neither is Shelley's Duck's Bahookie hair doo, black jacket, and white shirt collar...This is why the corruption on The Education Forum is so wickedly evil...Because it poisons and harms the phony academic standard that website pretends to uphold...Mark Knight is like a dirty small town sheriff who always does the job he's expected to do with his rulings and avoids recognizing the dishonest corruption of the people he's ruling in favor of...The membership pretends to avoid it as well...Simkin then puts on that phony Oxford/Cambridge above it all intellectual act and skates past the issue that he is fully responsible for as if he doesn't notice...The current Couch/Darnell film is good enough for any credible researcher to realize the pair fast-walking up the extension are already long proven to be Shelley and Lovelady and that anyone doubting it is basically trolling and marring good progress of research...The Education Forum refuses to answer for the correct evidence on Prayer Man that proves Prayer Man is Sarah Stanton...This one thing alone discredits all the self-platitudes they assign themselves as far as credibility...

The Education Forum gets away with the murder of switching the issue from the rotten dishonesty of Sandy Larsen and his deletion of evidence that disproved himself to a witch-hunt against the researcher who single-handedly out-argued the board on its favorite pet theory...The dishonest scoundrel who pushed that theory (Bart Kamp) is now safely a member while he still hasn't admitted the obvious evidence that refuted him...Mark Knight has been allowed to disappear the entire issue by means of bullying and vindictive moderation disguised as high-minded academic moderation and ban the person with the correct evidence for life on trumped-up BS designed to protect the wrong-doers...Knight is not made to answer for how his wrongful moderation has prevented exposure of the most important evidence discovery of our generation nor is that very important discovery ever shown on the forum...Jim DiEugenio is shilled and pampered by a membership that honors his taking a theory that he already admitted to me was false and bringing it to Congress...This dubious process endangers the credibility of JFK Assassination research - but that doesn't bother Jim D because he is an entity that always manages to get bailed out by his own wordsmithing and the corrupt sycophants who always endorse it...This is all capped-off by the ultimate insult to injury of Andrew Iler having total power and pretending he has addressed all this with a dignified set of rules, when all he is is just another Jim DiEugenio butt-******...There has to be someone on The Education Forum who remembers Larsen's photo analysis of Lovelady's plaid bars...The main thrust of that forum is not good research...It is organized dishonesty and may they be damned for it...