Well, let's see:
1. I contacted Bart Kamp and asked for his explanation of the image. He was kind enough to respond. I shared that response here. Since the title of the thread is "How Did Bart Kamp Create the Lovelady Image?" - well, my little contribution seems rather relevant to me.
2. I repeatedly posted Bart's contact information and challenged anyone with the cojones to do so to contact him directly. While boldly accusing Bart of fakery, no one else had the cojones to contact him. Why? We know why: because Bart, his work and his reputation are way out of your league and it's way more fun to accuse and speculate than actually attempt to resolve an issue that might eviscerate some beloved conspiracy factoid.
Royell is a Grade A buffoon. Everyone here, presumably including you, knows it. If the question as to how Bart enhanced the image is "beyond simple," THEN ASK HIM, I could crush a Grape ooooh yummy yummy.
How did Kamp get such amazing detail from such a degraded image?
Why can't this level of detail be recreated from a superior image?
You have swallowed down his identification of 'Lovelady' wholesale, without even bothering to contemplate these questions.
Even though you are now aware of this issue you still swallow it down.
You're so critical of Royell, but what does that make you? Gullible? Lazy?
Here's a thought for you to mull over - it is impossible to to get greater detail from the inferior image. Have a little think about this FACT.
So, the question remains,
still unanswered - How did Bart Kamp create the Lovelady image?
PS: that you think this question doesn't need answering because Kamp is such an amazing researcher speaks volumes about your approach to uncovering the truth.