JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
How Did Bart Kamp Create The Lovelady Image?
Royell Storing:
--- Quote from: Tom Graves on October 25, 2025, 03:08:10 AM ---Dear Comrade Storing,
I have no idea which woman you're talking about.
Regardless, do you believe that the montage that James created by overlaying the Couch-Darnell frame that best shows the front part of the MYSTO "ABANDONED" GETAWAY CAR with a frame from Wiegman that puts all of the non-human elements (e.g., the "Freeway Signs Pole," the "Signal Light Pole," and the HUGE GATES, etc., etc.) in the same place as they are in the corresponding Couch-Darnell frame was improperly done, or that said montage can't be used to figure out where your MYSTO "ABANDONDED" GETAWAY CAR might be "hiding" behind the throng of people in Wiegman?
Scroll down to look at James' montage for the first time. (LOL)
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,4597.40.html
-- Tom
--- End quote ---
Please explain the pointed object laying across the Island on the Wiegman still frame. You gotta problem here. A Big, Big Problem on a Wiegman still frame you are swearing by. I am waiting for your explanation.
Tom Graves:
--- Quote from: Royell Storing on October 25, 2025, 04:42:12 PM --- Please explain the pointed object laying across the Island on the Wiegman still frame. You gotta problem here. A Big, Big Problem on a Wiegman still frame you are swearing by. I am waiting for your explanation.
--- End quote ---
Oh, you mean the fin of the car that was in front of Wiegman's car as it appeared in the cropped-and-pasted, ten-frames-earlier frame that James pasted into the main frame to give us an expanded view of the scene?
What about it?
In order to show us a wider "landscape" view of the scene, James melded the frame from approx. 01:16 to the frame from approx. 01:28 in the "JFK - Wiegman Film Enhanced One Frame Per Second Part One" clip that's available to view on the Internet.
There are ten frames in that interval. (Count the "jumps.")
Question:
How many frames per second did Wiegman's camera shoot?
Answer:
I don't know.
Do you?
Does it really matter?
Note how the shoulder of the woman standing "next to" Fedora Man is correctly spliced together from the two frames, as is the pole that they're standing "next to"?
What's your problem, Comrade Storing?
Scroll down to James' fine overlay montage and take your second look at it.
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,4597.40.html
Royell Storing:
--- Quote from: Tom Graves on October 25, 2025, 09:28:19 PM ---Oh, you mean a previous-frame "ghost image" of the fin of the car that was in front of Wiegman's car?
What about it?
In order to show us a wider "landscape" view of the scene, James melded the frame from approx. 01:16 to the frame from approx. 01:28 in the "JFK - Wiegman Film Enhanced One Frame Per Second Part One" clip that's available to view on the Internet.
There are ten frames in that interval.
Question:
How many frames per second did Wiegman's camera shoot?
Answer:
I don't know.
Do you?
Does it really matter?
Note how the shoulder of the man standing next to "Fedora Man" is correctly spliced together from the two frames, as is the pole that they're standing "next to"?
What's your problem, Comrade Storing?
Scroll down to James' fine overlay montage:
https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,4597.40.html
--- End quote ---
How can you claim anything based on a still frame that you NOW admit includes at least 1 "Ghost Image"? In addition to that, you admit that same still frame has also been subjected to "splicing". That Wiegman still frame has flat out been Sliced-And-Diced. This is why I encourage you to stick with the Film(s) and still frame(s) "as is". I'm not even going to go into the "Lego Car" stuff. That is comical.
Tom Graves:
--- Quote from: Royell Storing on October 25, 2025, 10:15:30 PM ---How can you claim anything based on a still frame that you NOW admit includes at least 1 "Ghost Image"? In addition to that, you admit that same still frame has also been subjected to "splicing". That Wiegman still frame has flat out been Sliced-And-Diced. This is why I encourage you to stick with the Film(s) and still frame(s) "as is". I'm not even going to go into the "Lego Car" stuff. That is comical.
--- End quote ---
Dear Comrade Storing,
Read it again and you'll realize that I deleted the phrase "ghost image" before you posted.
Why?
Because the fin isn't really a ghost image but an integral part of a frame that was taken about half-a-second earlier than the main frame and which was cropped by James and melded by him to said larger, half-a-second-later frame in order to give us an expanded view of the scene, and specifically of the area where your MYSTO ABANDONED GETAWAY CAR is probably hidden by the gaggle of people who are standing either on the "island" or in the street near it.
Do you have a problem with that?
Do you think that gaggle of people reassembled itself during that half-second?
Even if it did, what would it matter?
If anything, they HELPED you by hiding your MYSTO "ABANDONED" GETAWAY CAR so you can jump up and down and yell, Look! The MYSTO "ABANDONED" GETAWAY CAR hasn't gotten there quite yet!!!"
LOL!
-- Tom
Royell Storing:
Your admitted "deletion" of admitting to a "ghost image", is right in line with your deletion of "you lost me" with respect to Hackerott's shadow work. As Joe Louis used to say, "You can run, but you can't hide". You are running now. You're lack of knowledge will continue to expose you over and over. Just do the research. You will not have to "hide your tracks" with these repeated deletions if you do the work and arm yourself with Knowledge.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version