Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Lovelady in Darnell and it's Ramifications.  (Read 126732 times)

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4213
Re: Lovelady in Darnell and it's Ramifications.
« Reply #336 on: October 11, 2025, 02:18:34 AM »
There's no way Officer Baker is climbing that stairwell "about" 45 seconds after the Kill Shot. That's Flash Gordon material. Probably closer to 1:30+. Baker had no idea where he was going inside the TSBD and he and Truly even screwed around getting through a door and then messing around with the elevator too. Baker was Not inside the TSBD 30 seconds after the Kill Shot either. It took him that long to turn the Elm St. corner, stop his motorcycle at the curb, and then rack it. Baker even admits to almost dumping the motorcycle due to the wind as he was slowly turning onto Houston. Tick/Tock, Tick/Tock! You guys have been bamboozled by the WC and to this day you merely echo their bogus timelines. Think Baker's journey through. Read his WC Testimony. He was Not sure that shots had been fired from the TSBD. And he did Not see pigeons flying from the roof of the TSBD. That's even more WC  BS:.  And Baker was bullied/coached during his WC dress rehearsal runs. They made it clear what they wanted/expected.

Dear Comrade Storing,

How about 60 seconds?

Does that work for you?

GROK:

For Oswald, Truly, and Baker to be in the second-floor lunchroom vestibule while Adams and Styles are transiting the second-floor corner, given Truly and Baker start ascending 60 seconds after the final shot and Oswald takes 30 seconds on the stairs:

Oswald starts descending 24 seconds after the final shot.

Adams and Styles start descending 42 seconds after the final shot.

This ensures convergence at 72 seconds after the final shot, with Oswald on the stairs for 30 seconds.

-- Tom


Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5602
Re: Lovelady in Darnell and it's Ramifications.
« Reply #337 on: October 11, 2025, 02:52:43 AM »

  How about actually reading what I posted?

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4213
Re: Lovelady in Darnell and it's Ramifications.
« Reply #338 on: October 11, 2025, 02:58:23 AM »
How about actually reading what I posted?

Dear Comrade Storing,

Even though Baker and Truly can be seen very near the TSBD steps about 25 seconds after the final shot in Couch-Darnell, you don't think they could have started going up the stairs about 35 seconds later?

-- Tom
« Last Edit: October 11, 2025, 03:14:19 AM by Tom Graves »

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5602
Re: Lovelady in Darnell and it's Ramifications.
« Reply #339 on: October 11, 2025, 04:21:49 AM »

  The power of the Ring is turning you into Gollum, Mr Frodo. Better give it up.

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4213
Re: Lovelady in Darnell and it's Ramifications.
« Reply #340 on: October 11, 2025, 04:36:02 AM »
The power of the Ring is turning you into Gollum, Mr Frodo. Better give it up.

Is that the best you've got, Comrade Storing?

It's a doggone shame you don't want to answer my question.

« Last Edit: October 11, 2025, 04:40:42 AM by Tom Graves »

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5602
Re: Lovelady in Darnell and it's Ramifications.
« Reply #341 on: October 11, 2025, 05:44:38 PM »
       I should have the remaining peer review in next week. This process takes time due to the subject matter being NEW and involves corroborating tentacles. No Spoilers  ......................   STAY TUNED  ..................................
« Last Edit: October 11, 2025, 05:45:26 PM by Royell Storing »

Offline Lance Payette

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1760
Re: Lovelady in Darnell and it's Ramifications.
« Reply #342 on: October 11, 2025, 05:56:30 PM »
       I should have the remaining peer review in next week. This process takes time due to the subject matter being NEW and involves corroborating tentacles. No Spoilers  ......................   STAY TUNED  ..................................
Having gone through the often-unpleasant peer review process for law review articles, it doesn't mean asking three other True Believers "So whaddya think?" Review is solicited by an editor from qualified reviewers who are and remain anonymous to the author. I realize this isn't realistic for whatever you're talking about, but "Dan, Michael and Martin don't think I'm crazy" is not peer review. We will indeed STAY TUNED, just as we've been STAYING TUNED for the bombshells you promised months ago, but hopefully your peer review is something more than "my fellow True Believers like it."