Lovelady in Darnell and it's Ramifications.

Author Topic: Lovelady in Darnell and it's Ramifications.  (Read 1359 times)

Offline Lance Payette

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 859
Re: Lovelady in Darnell and it's Ramifications.
« Reply #32 on: Yesterday at 11:20:51 PM »
Advertisement
Very good post, Dan. Yes, Lovelady and Shelley, like many other witnesses, changed their stories to conform to the lone-gunman tale.

Except: Shelley said he saw Oswald on the first floor by the telephone at 11:50 and that he thought the shots came from the west. Lovelady was even more specific that he thought the shots came from the knoll. He also offered that he had seen Oswald bring his lunch several times and eat in the domino room with other guys. As has been noted with Ruth Paine, both passed up numerous, obvious opportunities to incriminate Oswald and improve the LN narrative. What you say simply makes no sense outside of CT world. Even WC Sham Man Dan disagrees with you - but, alas, his theory ("to cover up their actual movements") makes no sense either. It's all, as always, ad hoc speculation to conform to a preconceived conspiracy theory. In CT world, no one ever gets confused or makes an innocent mistake; even dumbass warehouse workers in the midst of an overwhelming event like the JFKA aren't allowed to be human.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Lovelady in Darnell and it's Ramifications.
« Reply #32 on: Yesterday at 11:20:51 PM »


Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1898
Re: Lovelady in Darnell and it's Ramifications.
« Reply #33 on: Yesterday at 11:27:53 PM »




Thanks for posting these blown-up comparisons, Danny Old Boy.

I think the floor they were standing on was sloped, or the camera was tilted or something because I'm pretty sure Calvery was a bit taller than next-tallest Westbrook.

Regardless, Fancy Pants' glomming onto Speer's belief that "All-In-White Woman" was Westbrook doesn't help him in his attempt to disprove that Calvery was on the steps in Couch-Darnell because even if we accept that (i.e., that "All-In-White Woman" was Westbrook), Westbrook-Scranton still forgot that she was standing to the left of Calvery during the motorcade (as we can see in Zapruder), and she therefore blew her narrative (and her creditability) out of the water in 2018 by placing herself to the right of "her".

-- Tom
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 11:42:05 PM by Tom Graves »

Online Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3568
Re: Lovelady in Darnell and it's Ramifications.
« Reply #34 on: Yesterday at 11:31:38 PM »
Except: Shelley said he saw Oswald on the first floor by the telephone at 11:50 and that he thought the shots came from the west. Lovelady was even more specific that he thought the shots came from the knoll. He also offered that he had seen Oswald bring his lunch several times and eat in the domino room with other guys. As has been noted with Ruth Paine, both passed up numerous, obvious opportunities to incriminate Oswald and improve the LN narrative. What you say simply makes no sense outside of CT world. Even WC Sham Man Dan disagrees with you - but, alas, his theory ("to cover up their actual movements") makes no sense either. It's all, as always, ad hoc speculation to conform to a preconceived conspiracy theory. In CT world, no one ever gets confused or makes an innocent mistake; even dumbass warehouse workers in the midst of an overwhelming event like the JFKA aren't allowed to be human.

 "Shelley said he saw Oswald on the first floor by the telephone at 11:50"

Citation, old-timer.
(isn't it past your bedtime?)
And how do you reconcile your beloved Sham's claim that Givens was the last TSBD employee to see Oswald (near the southeast corner of the 6th floor, no less) when we have Shelley and Piper placing him on the first floor after this?
And why do you think Shelley and Lovelady lied about their movements in the aftermath of the assassination, if it wasn't something suspicious?  ;)

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Lovelady in Darnell and it's Ramifications.
« Reply #34 on: Yesterday at 11:31:38 PM »


Online Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3568
Re: Lovelady in Darnell and it's Ramifications.
« Reply #35 on: Yesterday at 11:37:16 PM »
Thanks for posting these blown-up comparisons, Danny Old Boy.

I think the floor they were standing on was sloped, or the camera was tilted or something because I'm pretty sure Calvery was a bit taller than next-tallest Westbrook.

Regardless, Fancy Pants' glomming onto Speer's belief that "All-In-White Woman" was Westbrook doesn't help him in his attempt to disprove that Calvery was on the steps in Couch-Darnell because even if we accept that (i.e., that "All-In-White Woman" was Westbrook), Westbrook-Scranton still forgot that she was standing to the left of Calvery during the motorcade (as we can see in Zapruder), and that she blew her narrative (and her creditability) out of the water in 2018 by putting herself to the right of "her".

-- Tom

This is the original picture which I meant to post.
The picture below was taken in December 1963, a few weeks after the assassination and is of ‘the office girls’ working out of Room 203. It is one of a series of photos donated to the 6th Floor Museum by Karen Westbrook Scranton:
[Color photograph of six women who worked in the Texas School Book Depository – Results – Search Objects – The Sixth Floor Museum at Dealey Plaza (jfk.org)]




The photo appears with the following description::

“From left to right in this photo: Woman with dark hair whose name is unknown, Gloria Calvery (red hair, with glasses), Carol (last name unknown), another Carol (last name unknown), Karen Hicks in red, and on the far right, Westbrook.”

We know from the CE 1381’s that Westbrook worked with two Carol’s but, in the photo above, which Carol was Carol Hughes and which was Carol Ann Reed. On his website, Pat Speer reveals:
“Karen Westbrook also mentioned Carol Ann Reed... (Researcher Brian Doyle reports that he contacted Reed, and that she identified herself in the Christmas photos put online by Westbrook, and that she is the fourth woman from the left, with the white sleeves…)”

« Last Edit: Yesterday at 11:42:10 PM by Dan O'meara »

Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1898
Re: Lovelady in Darnell and it's Ramifications.
« Reply #36 on: Yesterday at 11:38:07 PM »
Except: Shelley said he saw Oswald on the first floor by the telephone at 11:50 and that he thought the shots came from the west. Lovelady was even more specific that he thought the shots came from the knoll. He also offered that he had seen Oswald bring his lunch several times and eat in the domino room with other guys. As has been noted with Ruth Paine, both passed up numerous, obvious opportunities to incriminate Oswald and improve the LN narrative. What you say simply makes no sense outside of CT world. Even WC Sham Man Dan disagrees with you - but, alas, his theory ("to cover up their actual movements") makes no sense either. It's all, as always, ad hoc speculation to conform to a preconceived conspiracy theory. In CT world, no one ever gets confused or makes an innocent mistake; even dumbass warehouse workers in the midst of an overwhelming event like the JFKA aren't allowed to be human.

"Shelley said he saw Oswald on the first floor by the telephone at 11:50."

So?

Maybe he was trying to call John Abt.
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 11:40:19 PM by Tom Graves »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Lovelady in Darnell and it's Ramifications.
« Reply #36 on: Yesterday at 11:38:07 PM »


Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3904
Re: Lovelady in Darnell and it's Ramifications.
« Reply #37 on: Yesterday at 11:46:17 PM »
Explain to me what you think Smith's movements are after the shooting.
It's a very simple thing to do, Royell.
You seem to have s very strong opinion about it but I can't make out what it is you actually think.
So, for clarification, explain to me what you think Smith's movements are after the shooting.

     This is exactly why You and everyone else needs to familiarize yourselves with Eyewitness Testimony. You swear by "images" and claim that eyewitness testimony is "unreliable".  And then we run into a situation like this, where the Officer Smith Testimony destroys this Calvery being the hysterical woman that told him about shots being fired through the bushes. This claim is Oswald on the TSBD steps in the Altgens Photo all over again. Officer Smith said he was facing (E) on Elm St and unable to see the windows on the County Bld on his (R). I believe Officer Smith was out on Elm St near that Laundry Truck alongside the Dal Tex Bld. From this point after hearing the shots, he testified that he headed "UP Toward this book depository". Images are easy to look at. A lazy way to try and find the truth. Take the time and read the eyewitness testimony of main players. It stands the test of time and the bias of the researcher.
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 11:50:13 PM by Royell Storing »

Online Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3568
Re: Lovelady in Darnell and it's Ramifications.
« Reply #38 on: Yesterday at 11:59:58 PM »
     This is exactly why You and everyone else needs to familiarize yourselves with Eyewitness Testimony. You swear by "images" and claim that eyewitness testimony is "unreliable".  And then we run into a situation like this, where the Officer Smith Testimony destroys this Calvery being the hysterical woman that told him about shots being fired through the bushes. This claim is Oswald on the TSBD steps in the Altgens Photo all over again. Officer Smith said he was facing (E) on Elm St and unable to see the windows on the County Bld on his (R). I believe Officer Smith was out on Elm St near that Laundry Truck alongside the Dal Tex Bld. From this point after hearing the shots, he testified that he headed "UP Toward this book depository".

I really don't know why you keep emphasising the word "UP".

In his testimony Smith travels from his position at the southeast corner of Elm and Houston to the "parking lot in behind the grassy area back from Elm Street toward the railroad tracks".
Did Smith travel west from the southeast corner of Elm and Houston and pass directly in front of the TSBD building as he made his way down the Elm Street extension toward the railroad track?
Yes or No.
« Last Edit: Today at 12:03:57 AM by Dan O'meara »

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3904
Re: Lovelady in Darnell and it's Ramifications.
« Reply #39 on: Today at 12:13:45 AM »
I really don't know why you keep emphasising the word "UP".

In his testimony Smith travels from his position at the southeast corner of Elm and Houston to the "parking lot in behind the grassy area back from Elm Street toward the railroad tracks".
Did Smith travel west from the southeast corner of Elm and Houston and pass directly in front of the TSBD building as he made his way down the Elm Street extension toward the railroad track?
Yes or No.

   "UP AND TOWARD". This is the direction that Smith was moving after the shots were fired and the hysterical lady told him about shots being fired through the bushes. "UP AND TOWARD" the TSBD would NOT put Smith moving in the direction of the Elm St Ext. This is what you may want, but it is Not what Smith claimed. You got it wrong. Like the Oswald ID on the Altgens Photo, you are claiming what you want to be the case. It is simply Not True per Officer Smith's WC Testimony.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Lovelady in Darnell and it's Ramifications.
« Reply #39 on: Today at 12:13:45 AM »